Zac Fleming, Checkpoint Producer
Conan Young , Reporter
The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) has referred evidence of potential serious staff misconduct to the Serious
Fraud Office (SFO), the ministry says.
Photo: RNZ / Richard Tindiller
The evidence came to light as a result of Official Information Act requests from RNZ asking for MPI correspondence with
Thompson and Clark.
MPI said in a statement it has also referred the matter to the State Services Commission (SSC) and it was part of the
SSC's inquiry into the use of external security consultants including Thompson & Clark.
However, MPI said the conduct of concern did not involve the contracting of Thompson & Clark by MPI.
It said information currently pointed to matters occurring before October 2013, and the staff involved no longer work
for MPI.
MPI said it was extremely disappointed, and would make no further comment while the two inquiries were underway.
The SFO has a high threshold for what it investigates - only cases where a number of people are significantly impacted,
or if the fraud undermines public confidence in New Zealand as a safe place to invest, is incredibly complex, or has
high public interest.
"Measures are already underway internally to understand how the matters may have occurred - even though they occurred
some years ago", MPI director general Martyn Dunne said in a statement.
"This will contribute to a 'lessons learned' exercise to ensure they cannot happen in the future.
"We are confident that current processes, structure and culture make it unlikely these events would occur now."
All government agencies will be scrutinised as part of an expanded probe by the SSC into the use of the security firm.
The initial inquiry was announced in March, by SSC Peter Hughes after it was revealed the firm spied on Canterbury earthquake claimants for Southern Response.
The inquiry was further widened to include the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, which had been spying on Greenpeace staff.
MPI said it uncovered potentially serious misconduct by some former staff members in their dealings with the firm.
Afterwards the Security Intelligence Service (SIS) also launched an internal investigation after evidence of its staff being unprofessional and biased towards the firm.