Gordon Campbell on how the drinking water crisis has been a failure of political leadership
It is almost possible to feel sorry for the Health Ministry in their terrible, no good, very bad week in which they got
(a) a damning report on the country’s unsafe drinking water and the Ministry’s weak to non-existent role in enforcing
our water safety standards
(d) the appointment of an independent (and expensively remunerated, at the rate of $518–$818 per day, each) five member
committee to advise the new Health Minister David Clark
, thus bypassing the Ministry’s own advisory role until such time as it can get its house in order.
Sure, you can choose to blame it all on the bureaucrats. Yet these calamities – and the drinking water crisis in
particular – seem like an inevitable outcome of the failures in political leadership by previous Health Ministers Tony Ryall and Jonathan Coleman - who after all, inherited a new and entirely
fit-for-purpose set of water safety standards devised in 2007, but who did next to nothing to ensure they were being
met. The buck surely, stops at the Minister’s office. (That’s why they get paid the big bucks.) It's not meant to stop
at the door of the Health Ministry’s top official.
Basically, bureaucrats enforce policy (or not) according to the political climate of the day. Ever since the public
service got politicized in the late 1980s, top officials have been conditioned to jump to the signals they get from the
Minister’s office, and their continued employment quickly comes to depend upon how sensitive they are to those signals.
The Beehive reality? For the past nine years, there has been a political culture of absentee government, where almost
any regulatory action that involved spending money fell out of favour. Cost cutting and budget balancing became
fetishes, and were pursued as ends in themselves. Yes, the Ministry may have provided ‘weak leadership’ – but this was
largely because the officials in question were being told to cut corners in the context of a systematically underfunded
health system, where risk to patients came to be regarded as the acceptable part of the state’s diminished role in the
sector. It didn’t help that many of the people (a) likely to get sick and (b) dependent on the public health system were
not seen as likely National voters.
So… the new government is now facing unmet need – and the costs involved – everywhere it looks. It will now cost a
fortune to pay the bills for the last government’s list of deferred social maintenance. Child poverty, run down health
and education systems, a crisis in affordable housing… and now the health risk involved in drinking the water from the tap
Such are the costs of de-regulation, after nine years of absentee government. She’ll be right? No, not anymore.
Yes, the drinking water crisis will be costly to fix
but since this is a problem that central government has allowed to fester, it should be one that central government
does the lion’s share of fixing. In the end it will entail a re-ordering of priorities. Currently, New Zealand has
allocated billions of dollars to Defence (over the next 20 years) to guard us against what even the NZDF concedes to be
risks that are non-existent now, and for the foreseeable future. We are also spending hundreds of millions to meet the potential risks from earthquakes in future – while underfunding a health system that is failing on a daily basis to cope with the
existing needs of sick people. In defence and earthquake planning, the risks are less palpable than those identified by this week’s second phase of the Havelock North inquiry
If the will exists, the money can be found. Keep in mind that the previous government lavished on Canterbury Finance
shareholders over ten times what it would now cost to enforce those excellent 2007 water safety standards. Currently
there are small, impoverished rural areas – such as say, around a tourism spot like Punakaiki –that are being allowed to
put our entire tourism industry in jeopardy with an unsafe supply of drinking water they’re giving to tourists. As the
Havelock North inquiry says at one point, it is those kind of risk areas (such as one of the prior contaminations they
cite, of the Darfield) water supply) that make immediate action imperative. If the main problem is in rural and
provincial areas, even centre right politicians ( from Shane Jones to Bill English) can surely be induced to treat their
safety as a priority
Time, for a change.
So… as predicted in this column last week, Time magazine has indeed bypassed Trump and awarded its ‘person of the year’ cover to the women who called out Harvey Weinstein and his ilk
And yes, it is still significant that Weinstein got brought down only when his power was in steep decline, and not
during his hey-day in the 1990s/early 2000s. Similarly belated credit is due to the women who accused President Bill
Clinton of sexual harassment in the 1990s. Back then they was treated as being mere pawns in a manufactured right wing
plot, akin to Whitewater…
Songs about water
You pushed me when I’m falling… This track may be more about pouring than drinking, but who needs an air-tight excuse to
play a great soul musician like James Carr?
And from her very first album, there’s also this terrific cut (“Water”) by P.J. Harvey, then still in the throes of her
Patti Smith phase… holy Mary, hold on tight, Icarus descending…