Seven of Syria’s Thirteen Palestinian camps now controlled by Salafi- Jihadists: Vows of ‘Occupation Until Martyrdom’
by Franklin Lamb
| Homs Palestinian Camp, Syria
August 12, 2013
Jihadists are entering Syria at an accelerating pace, according to Syrian, UNWRA, and Palestinian officials as well as
residents in the refugee camps here. For the now-estimated 7000 imported foreign fighters, Palestinian camps are seen as
optimal locales for setting up bases across Syria.
“Syria’s Palestinian camps have become theaters of war,” said UNWRA Commissioner Filippo Grandi.
The Syrian people compassionately host 10 official, UN-mandated Palestinian camps, along with three unofficial ones,
whose populations total at least 230,000. Eight of these are “Nakba (“catastrophe”) camps,” organized soon after
Palestinians were expelled from their homes in 1948, while two, Qabr Essit and Dera’a (emergency camp), are “Naksa (“day
of setback”) camps.” The latter were set up in 1967 as a result of the internationally condemned Zionist-colonial
aggression against the two sister-Arab-nationalist regions—Palestine’s West Bank and Syria’s Golan Heights.
And it was on the Ides of March of the year 2011 we saw an explosion of violence near one of these camps, the Dera’a
camp established in 1950, in the south near the Jordanian border.
But first, perhaps a simple listing of the camps, along with their populations and dates of establishment, would be in
1950, Dera’a, 5,916
1967, Dera’a (Emergency), 5,536
1950, Hama, 7,597
1949, Homs, 13,825
1948, Jaramana, 5,007
1950, Khan Dunoun, 8,603
1949, Khan Eshieh, 15,731
1948, Neirab, 17,994
1967, Qabr Essit, 16,016
1948, Sbeineh, 19,624
1955-6, Latakia camp, 6,534 registered refugees
1957, Yarmouk Camp, 112,550 registered refugees
1962, Ein Al-Tal, 4,329 registered refugees
As of 8/8/13, seven of the camps—two in the north and five in the Damascus area and in the south of Syria—are presently
with their throats under the jackboot of foreign Salafi-Jihadists. These jihadist cells moved against the camps early in
the current crisis for purposes of forced recruitment, to benefit from a supply of noncombatant human shields, to
shakedown the residents and take over UNWRA facilities, and to make use of the erstwhile “refugee camp security zones.”
All these steps were precursory to the setting up of military bases from which to launch operations aimed at toppling
the current government of the Syrian Arab Republic.
How do the jihadists infiltrate the camps?
How is it possible that more than half of the Palestinian camps in Syria not only fell, but did so, regrettably, without
all that much resistance, to the point at which we see them now—dominated by largely foreign jihadists who continue to
impose their unwanted extremist religious beliefs on a largely progressive secular Palestinian community? It is a
subject currently much discussed here.
This observer has deduced from a number of conversations—with former and current camp residents, as well as members of
the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, Palestinian NGO’s, and also with academics—that there is a ‘model
of occupation’ metastasizing in Syria in a manner strikingly similar to what we saw six years ago at Nahr al Bared
Palestinian camp near Tripoli Lebanon. The stories we hear today are quite similar to those from among the nearly 30,000
refugees at Nahr al Bared who were forced to flee to the nearby Badawi camp or to Lebanon’s ten other camps—reports
related to this observer in visits to Nahr al Bared in May of 2007.
What we hear today in Syria bears an almost uncanny likeness. For instance one lady, whose family is from Safad in
occupied Palestine explained: “First they (the intruders) appeared only a few in number. We noticed them and that some
had ‘foreign’ accents and wore conservative clothes, most had beards. They were polite and friendly. Then more arrived,
a few followed by women and children. They stayed to themselves at first and they began using the local mosque—even
being welcomed at first by local sheiks who sometimes expressed admiration for the sincerity and devoutness. Then some
of them began to preach their versions of the Koran, and at some point their gentle teaching became more strident, and
soon these men were commenting on how some of the Palestinian women dressed in an un-Islamic fashion and even lectured
young women about modesty and that they must change their ways, including stop smoking, and to leave public meetings if
they were the only women present, and wear a full hijab.”
The lady’s sister interrupted: “Then guns appeared and some of the men appeared to be very skilled when they would use,
for example, a school or playground to train. They were so serious and seemed to be in a trance of some kind. There was
no possibility to talk or reason with them. All they seemed to want was martyrdom! Some actually believe that Syria was
Palestine and they were here to liberate Al Quds!”
Upon some in the camps it began to dawn that the newcomers intended imposing their ideas, and that they fully intended
that camp residents should submit to “pure Islam,” as they view it. Some resistance began to jell from camp residents,
but the camp popular committees did not have the power to confront them, and a few actually joined them. The fighting
with Syrian government troops accelerated the takeover process, and soon the camp residents were presented with a
demand: join the gunmen and “liberate” the camps.
With respect to Ahmad Jibril’s Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command—and no offense meant to
them and their officials, with whom this observer met in July and early August—but several of their best Palestinian
patriot commanders jumped ship in protest against the plan to “liberate” Yarmouk. At the same time many of the PFLP-GC
rank-and-file fighters split and joined the opposition for various reasons, including better pay and wanting to be on
the presumed winning side. That being said, however, camp residents overwhelmingly rejected the PFLP-GC “defense”
project, and insisted that their camp was neutral, that it was to be maintained as a safe zone for its residents, who
were guests in Syria pending their return to still-occupied Palestine.
Again, this chain of events is singularly similar to what we saw (too late as it turned out) in Lebanon’s Nahr al Bared,
a process which, like the one unfolding now in Syria, was accelerated by the civil war raging here.
There is fear that the Syrian army will sooner or later attack and destroy the camps in order to confront the rebel
militias—similar to what the Lebanese army did during the 75 days of shelling in 2007. At that time it took vengeance on
the camp and demolished it in an unjustifiable frenzy of shelling for the criminal attack and killing of some Lebanese
troops, an attack that had been carried out by camp invaders, not Palestinians. For Palestinians in Syria, it is the all
too familiar fate of outsiders entering and seeking to control their camps, coupled with the threat of a host army
attacking them to confront the invaders. The residents are once more killed or forced to flee and their homes are
Here once more comes to mind the cliché: “Where is the Arab League, the Organization of Islamic Council, the EU or the
UN? Where’s Waldo?
In order to gain control of the camps in Syria, two main processes appear to be made use of by the al Qaeda affiliates.
One is what this observer labels the ‘Nahr al Bared model”. A Popular Committee member from Yarmouk, who just barely
escaped the camp before his home was destroyed by a direct hit mortar round, put it this way:
“Some come bearing gifts. They usually set up small problem solving centers. Maybe a little cash, offers of medical aid,
bread distribution, pledges of camp security, these sorts of currently absent social services.”
But the camps quickly become petri dishes, and the explosive growth of the foreign implantations is sometimes dazzling.
By the time government supporters report the camp invaders it’s too late. And what can the government do anyhow? Guns
appear everywhere, and suddenly it’s no longer ‘nicely nicely’ polite treatment from the Islamic brothers. Residents are
told they must help liberate the camp from the Assad regime or face the wrath of Allah. Consequently, fleeing for one’s
life becomes an utmost urgency, often literally as the snipers arrive and intense fighting, and rooftop targeting,
Dodging the snipers
So what happens next to the Palestinian camps in Syria? Is a hopeful, positive or peaceful resolution possible? This
observer’s 2-cents worth of analysis suggests that the answer is no. The camps will stay largely under the domination,
militarily and socially, of the jihadist elements that continue building fortifications and ‘digging in.’ What is
happening is a God-awful calamity, one being foisted upon those whose only prayers and wishes are to leave Syria and
return home to reclaim their stolen lands.
A central question is the precarious situation in Yarmouk and the fate of the 18-20 percent of its population still
remaining. These are people risking their lives daily trying to avoid snipers from both sides. One can hear speculation
on the prospects that the Syrian Army, aided by Hezbollah, will move on Yarmouk to try and expel the rebel militia. Some
PLO officials with offices inside the Yarmouk neighborhood claim that Ahmad Jibril’s PFLP-GC is being beefed up and
armed by the government with more than just AK47’s and RPG’s. Last winter, some of Jibril’s forces were expelled when
they tried to eject the foreign militia, while others, as mentioned above, went over to the opposite side. At the same
time, three PFLP-GC commanders quit over tactics while questioning Jibril’s decision to violate the camp’s neutrality, a
decision leading to the destruction of parts of Yarmouk.
As to speculation on the possibility of the Syrian government and/or Hezbollah moving to eject the foreign forces from
Yarmouk, this observer does not give the reports much credit. The Syrian Army has more urgent and prioritized battles
being waged today, with others being planned. Hezbollah, likewise, is facing challenges at present, and fighting in
Yarmouk against unknown numbers of rebel militia would surely add to them. Moreover, any force invading a Palestinian
camp faces being roundly condemned over violations of the Cairo agreement forbidding host governments from entering
UNRWA refugee camps.
This observer and contacts in the Palestinian community cannot verify the recent report for a foreign media source that
al Nusra has fled Yarmouk and is on the run. On the run from whom? Currently they are not being seriously challenged. On
the contrary, the al-Qeada affiliates are busy digging more tunnels under the camps to store weapons and move freely.
Their ranks are growing not dwindling.
Grim as it sounds, they who reside in Syria’s camps, along with the 12 million Palestinian refugees worldwide, will
continue to be at the mercy of events they had no part in creating. It is a fate they share at this moment with much of
the rest of Syria’s population, and things are not likely to improve in the immediate term.
But on a more positive note, the Palestinians of Syria persist in their resistance and opposition to the illegal
occupation of their country. Theirs is a determination to return to their homeland that simply will not fade or wither,
and speaking with Palestinian refugees these past several days in Damascus and Homs has convinced this observer more
than ever that on this they will not retreat a single inch—and that in time they will liberate their country.
Franklin Lamb is doing research in Syria and Lebanon.