"Proving Election Fraud" by Richard Charnin (TruthIsAll)
Stock deals are rigged for insiders. Big money runs Congress. And we've gone to war based on a series of calculated
Are you willing to accept the fact that our elections are subject to the same type of corruption?
If you are, then Proving Election Fraud
by Richard Charnin pulls back the curtain and exposes the pattern of election fraud over the past four decades. It's
not a mystery when your look at the numbers and check them against multiple public sources. The information is all there
- if the experts care to look.
Charnin is the widely known internet poster using the name TruthIsAll. He was the first to discover the glaring discrepancies in the 2004 election results shortly after the polls closed.
His internet posts on the mathematical impossibility of a Bush victory were critical in fueling the doubts about that
election and those that followed.
His many posts are the basis for a consistent narrative and argument using a clearly outlined and heavily quantified
analysis. The result is a wealth of information about how elections really work and a methodology (the True Vote Model) that allows the interested reader to check the official results of any national or state election.
Charnin's straightforward style fits his subject matter. For example, early on he makes a powerful point, one of many
that appear throughout the book:
"Simple mathematics proves that the 1968, 1988, 2004 and 2008 elections were fraudulent. The returning voter mix
required for the Final Exit Poll to match the recorded vote was not just implausible -- it was impossible. In each
election, more voters from the prior election returned to vote than were alive. The fact that they were returning Nixon,
Bush 1 and Bush 2 voters cannot just be a coincidence. The statistical anomaly has no rational explanation other than
election fraud." (p.52)
When the official victory margin includes dead voters and excludes uncounted votes, it's more than reasonable to assume
How does Charnin know this? He took the time to correlate pre-election polls, historical (Census) votes cast and
recorded, voter mortality, returning voter turnout and national exit poll vote shares. Using this basic information, he
calculates the True Vote for each presidential election since 1968. And he debunks the arguments designed to convince us
that Bush actually won while the exit polls "behaved badly," including "reluctant Bush responder," "swing/red shift,"
and "false recall."
Uncounted and Phantom Votes
Uncounted and "phantom" voters are the basis for much of the analysis found in the book. Votes remain uncounted because
they're "spoiled" or of a separate class, provisional and absentee votes. Returning "phantom" voters were necessary in
order to force the Final National Exit Poll to match the recorded vote in the four elections referenced.
Nixon won by half a million recorded votes, but six million went uncounted. George H.W. Bush won by seven million and
more than ten million were uncounted. Gore won by a half million with five million uncounted. And Kerry lost by three
million with four million uncounted. Uncounted votes are typically from minority districts where the vote is
consistently 70-90% for the Democratic candidate. Is that a coincidence?
Had the phantom voters not materialized and had all the votes been counted, history would have changed. In addition, the
Clinton and Obama margins would have been significantly higher than recorded, perhaps forcing the hoped for change. More
important, the will of the people would have been accurately measured in what we were led to believe was a fair election
Knowledge is Power
Specialization often times advances a particular field of study and produces greater knowledge and more useful theories,
services and products. However, in the case of elections, complexity and specialization are enemies of the people. They
take away access to and participation in the voting process and blind us to the awareness of voting irregularities and
Proving Election Fraud dispels the mysteries of modern elections. It walks the reader through the process of understanding how elections work,
provides simple explanations of the principals of election analysis and offers an online resource that anyone can use to
develop their own True Vote Model. Of equal or greater importance, Charmin's relentlessly thorough analysis shows just
how outrageous election fraud is and frees the reader to analyze the accuracy of official election results.
There couldn't be a better time than right now to analyze elections. In 2004, less than 10% of voters thought that the
election was rigged. By mid 2006, two major polls showed that nearly half of the registered voters thought so. It's time
to take an objective and liberating look at how elections really work in order to demand that they work for us.
This review may be reproduced in whole or in part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.
Disclosure: In 2006, Charnin (known to me then as “TruthIsAll’”) and I collaborated on a three-part series which quantified the risk
of fraud in the midterm elections.