Now Legal Immunity for Swine flu Vaccine Makers
The US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, has just signed a decree granting vaccine makers total
legal immunity from any lawsuits that result from any new “Swine Flu” vaccine. Moreover, the $7 billion US Government
fast-track program to rush vaccines onto the market in time for the Autumn flu season is being done without even normal
safety testing. Is there another agenda at work in the official WHO hysteria campaign to declare so-called H1N1
virus—which has yet to be rigorously scientifically isolated, characterized and photographed with an electron
microscope—the scientifically accepted procedure—a global “pandemic” threat?
The current official panic campaign over alleged Swine Flu danger is rapidly taking on the dimensions of a George Orwell
science fiction novel. The document signed by Sebelius grants immunity to those making a swine flu vaccine, under the
provisions of a 2006 law for public health emergencies.
Not so sage SAGE
That is once the WHO in Geneva, on recommendation of the WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group on Immunizations, declared H1N1
to be Phase 6 or Pandemic, automatic emergency health response programs could be activated even in countries such as
Germany where reported outbreaks of even “suspected” H1N1 can be counted to date on the fingers of slightly more than
The WHO’s SAGE is also worth scrutiny. Its Chairman since 2005 has been the UK Director of Immunization at the British
Department of Health, Dr David Salisbury. In the 1980’s Salisbury reportedly drew major fire for backing a massive
vaccination of children with a multiple MMR vaccine manufactured by the predecessor company of GlaxoSmithKline. That
vaccine was pulled off the market in Japan after significant numbers of children developed adverse reactions to the
vaccine and the Japanese government was forced to pay significant compensation to the victims. In Sweden the MMR vaccine
of GlaxoSmithKline was removed after scientists linked it to outbreaks of Crohn’s disease. Apparently that had little
impact on WHO SAGE chairman Salisbury.
According to one independent UK investigator, Alan Golding, who obtained Freedom of Information documents on the case,
in “1986 Trivirix, an MMR compound containing the Mumps Urabe strain AM-9, was introduced in Canada to replace MMR I.
Concerns regarding the introduction of MMR in the UK are recorded in the minutes of the Joint Working Party of the
British Paediatric Association and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) Liaison Group on June 26th
of that year. Such concerns were soon to prove well grounded, as reports began to come in of an increased incidence of
aseptic meningitis in vaccinated individuals. Ultimately, all MMR vaccines containing the Urabe strain of mumps were
withdrawn in Canada in early 1988. This was before Urabe containing vaccines were licenced by the Department of Health
for use in the UK…”
The report adds, “Smith-Kline—French, the pharmaceutical company who became Smith-Kline-Beecham and were involved in UK
manufacture at that time, were concerned about these safety issues and were reluctant to obtain a UK license for their
Urabe-containing vaccines. As a result of their ‘concern’ that children might be seriously damaged by one of their
products, they requested that the UK government indemnify them against possible legal action that might be taken as a
result of ‘losses’ associated with the vaccine, which by then was known to carry significant risk to health. The UK
government, advised by Professor Salisbury and representatives from the Department of Health, in it’s enthusiasm to get
a cheap MMR onto the market, agreed to this request.”
Today the same Dr Salisbury is advocating global proliferation of untested H1N1 vaccines, also manufactured by the same
firm, now called GlaxoSmithKline
The last phoney Swine Flu Disaster
The last time the US Government faced a new swine flu virus was in 1976. Thousands filed claims contending they suffered
side effects from the shots. This time, the government has taken steps to prevent any possible legal remedy should
thousands of US citizens suffer severe complications as a result of being given untested vaccines.
In 1976 President Gerald Ford, facing a difficult re-election campaign, was advised by the head of the CDC, David
Sencer, to launch a mass national vaccination. As today with H1N1 Swine Flu, Sencer also used the scare of the alleged
1918 flu pandemic. Notably, some scientific researchers maintain that the deaths during the flu wave of 1918-1919, in
the aftermath of the ghastly First World War, came not from any virus but from the governmental campaigns of mass
vaccination against “Spanish Flu.” Interestingly, the Rockefeller University and Foundation was in the middle of that
event as well.
Cases of what was then called swine flu were found in soldiers at Fort Dix, N.J. in 1976, including one death. That
death, whose true cause is in dispute as the soldier, sick with influenza was put on a forced march despite and fell
dead, was used by Sencer to convince Ford to launch one of the most infamous public health fiascos in US history,
forcing Sencer’s resignation as CDC head. Federal officials vaccinated 40 million Americans during a national campaign.
A pandemic never materialized, but thousands who got the shots filed injury claims, as they contracted a paralyzing
condition called Guillain-Barre Syndrome or other side effects. At least 25 people died after receiving the vaccine died
and 500 developed Guillain-Barre syndrome, an inflammation of the nervous system which can cause paralysis and be fatal.
The US Government was forced to pay damages after vaccination victims made it a national scandal. In the end the 1976
Swine Flu vaccine proved far worse than the disease.
Sencer was fired in 1977 for the fiasco but by then the damage had already been done.
No Safety Test? Don’t worry, be happy…
The story gets worse. Now that the Obama Administration has signed a document of immunity from legal prosecution, the
FDA in the United States and UK health authorities have decided to let Big Pharma put vaccine products onto the market
before any tests of the possible harmful side effects of the vaccines are even known.
The first doses of swine flu vaccine will be given to the public before full data on its safety and effectiveness become
available. The untested “pandemic” vaccines will be spread over two doses in a higher quantity, and one brand reportedly
will contain a chemical additive, an adjuvant, to make it “go further,” dramatically potentially increasing the risk of
Children will be among those first in line for the shots and may get the vaccine more than a month before trial results
In the UK the government’s National Health Service, NHS, has been ordered to plan for a worst-case scenario in which
swine flu might cause 65,000 deaths over the coming winter, including several thousand deaths among children.
The British Government has placed advance orders for 132 million doses of vaccine with two manufacturers,
GlaxoSmithKline and Baxter, who have licensed “in advance” three "core" vaccines in preparation for a pandemic,
conveniently enough even though we are told by WHO and epidemiologists that we cannot prepare in advance for what could
be a more ominous mutation of the currently very mild H1N1 problem.
Curiously enough, a full year before any reported case of the current alleged H1N1, the major pharmaceutical company,
Baxter, filed for a patent for H1N1 vaccine: Baxter Vaccine Patent Application US 2009/0060950 A1. Their application
states, “the composition or vaccine comprises more than one antigen.....such as influenza A and influenza B in
particular selected from of one or more of the human H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, H5N1, H7N7, H1N2, H9N2, H7N2, H7N3, H10N7
subtypes, of the pig flu H1N1, H1N2, H3N1 and H3N2 subtypes, of the dog or horse flu H7N7, H3N8 subtypes or of the avian
H5N1, H7N2, H1N7, H7N3, H13N6, H5N9, H11N6, H3N8, H9N2, H5N2, H4N8, H10N7, H2N2, H8N4, H14N5, H6N5, H12N5 subtypes."
The application further states, “Suitable adjuvants can be selected from mineral gels, aluminium hydroxide, surface
active substances, lysolecithin, pluronic polyols, polyanions or oil emulsions such as water in oil or oil in water, or
a combination thereof. Of course the selection of the adjuvant depends on the intended use. E.g. toxicity may depend on
the destined subject organism and can vary from no toxicity to high toxicity."
With no legal liability, could it be that Baxter is preparing to sell hundreds of millions of doses containing highly
toxic aluminium hydroxide as adjuvant? Perhaps it is time to demand that all leading officials of WHO, SAGE and CDC, the
US Obama Administration, Cabinet officials and members of Congress who voted the $7 billion H1N1 emergency funds and who
have gone along with the declaration of pharmaceutical company immunity from subsequent prosecution for damage from
their products. The same should apply as well for other national health bodies demanding its citizens take the H1N1
vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline or Baxter to see if it is really safe.
And WHO stopped even tracking H1N1
Another indication that the world is being taken for colossal suckers in the entire WHO Swine Flu scare scenario, the
WHO itself, the world body entrusted to monitor outbreaks of so-called pandemics or even epidemics worldwide, has just
decided to stop tracking Swine Flu or H1N1 Influenza A as they prefer to name it now, so as not to offend Smithfield
Foods and other industrialized pig CAFO producers.
The World Health Organization in a “briefing note” posted on their Web site posted the baffling notice that they would
no longer track outbreaks of H1N1. The last WHO update, issued July 6, showed 94,512 confirmed cases in 122 countries,
with 429 deaths. The WHO apparently claims that the numbers of laboratory-confirmed cases were actually meaningless.
The briefing note said countries would still be asked to report their first few confirmed cases. It also said countries
should watch for clusters of fatalities, which could indicate the virus had mutated to a more lethal form. Other
“signals to be vigilant for,” it said, were spikes in school absenteeism and surges in hospital visits. The Atlanta CDC
has also agreed to the WHO count drop. Dr. Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research
and Policy at the University of Minnesota, admits that the existing tests to confirm H1N1 Influenza A are not even
certain, but rather hit-or-miss. “Bad measures can be worse than no measures at all,” he stated. So the WHO has decided
to drop tests that anyway did not give a scientific picture of who had H1N1 or not, and as well they have decided to
drop counting any test results or cases of H1n1 around the world with the comment that “we can assume almost all cases
are H1N1 Swine Flu. This is science on which basis we are told to vaccinate our young? Whoah there…Not with our
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the
text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research
articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better
understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: email@example.com
© Copyright F William Engdahl, GlobalResearch.ca