Thousands Of Eligible Voters Illegally Removed From Voter Rolls
We've been reporting on the GOP's October "Surprise" over the last few days (challenges to Democratic voter registrations in a number of states, and, perhaps more notably, their bogus PR campaign to charge that ACORN, a community organization who heroically registers millions of low-income voters who nobody else bothers to, is committing "voter fraud". See here, here and here, for example.)
But the November Surprise, as we've been trying to warn for many months (if not years), will undoubtedly be the thousands who show up to the polls to vote on November 4th, only to find out that they have somehow "fallen off" the voter rolls.
We've urged folks to check their registrations, even if they recently voted in a primary election, to make sure they haven't been purged (info on how to do that quickly in all 50 states, right here.)
Late last month, CBS News reported on voter purges occurring in at least 19 states across the country, many of them swing states, naturally.
Today, the New York Times has published a scathing report, based on a detailed investigation revealing that "Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states
have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law".
We've got to run out to host an hour of "Election Year Special Coverage" right now on KPFK/Pacifica, (guests to include filmmakers Patty Sharaf of Murder, Spies & Voting Lies: The Clint Curtis Story and John Ennis of Free For All!: One Dude's Quest for Democracy), so here are some very notable, must-read excerpts from the Times full report for the moment. So, we may have more thoughts on all of this later today, but for now, please read on!...
Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked
from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law, according to a review of state records and Social Security
data by The New York Times.
...
[B]ecause Democrats have been more aggressive at registering new voters this year, according to state election
officials, any heightened screening of new applications may affect their party’s supporters disproportionately. The
screening or trimming of voter registration lists in the six states — Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and
North Carolina — could also result in problems at the polls on Election Day: people who have been removed from the rolls
are likely to show up only to be challenged by political party officials or election workers, resulting in confusion,
long lines and heated tempers.
Some states allow such voters to cast provisional ballots. But they are often not counted because they require added
verification.
...
Michigan and Colorado are removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election, which is not allowed
except when voters die, notify the authorities that they have moved out of state, or have been declared unfit to vote.
Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio seem to be improperly using Social Security data to verify registration
applications for new voters.
In addition to the six swing states, three more states appear to be violating federal law. Alabama and Georgia seem to
be improperly using Social Security information to screen registration applications from new voters. And Louisiana
appears to have removed thousands of voters after the federal deadline for taking such action.
Under federal law, election officials are supposed to use the Social Security database to check a registration
application only as a last resort, if no record of the applicant is found on state databases, like those for driver’s
licenses or identification cards.
The requirement exists because using the federal database is less reliable than the state lists, and is more likely to
incorrectly flag applications as invalid. Many state officials seem to be using the Social Security lists first.
In the year ending Sept. 30, election officials in Nevada, for example, used the Social Security database more than
740,000 times to check voter files or registration applications and found more than 715,000 nonmatches, federal records
show. Election officials in Georgia ran more than 1.9 million checks on voter files or voter registration applications
and found more than 260,000 nonmatches.
...
In three states — Colorado, Louisiana and Michigan — the number of people purged from the election rolls since Aug. 1
far exceeds the number who may have died or relocated during that period.
States may be improperly removing voters who have moved within the state, election experts said, or who are considered
inactive because they have failed to vote in two consecutive federal elections. For example, major voter registration
drives have been held this year in Colorado, which has also had a significant population increase since the last
presidential election, but the state has recorded a net loss of nearly 100,000 voters from its rolls since 2004.
...
In Michigan, some 33,000 voters were removed from the rolls in August, a figure that is far higher than the number of
deaths in the state during the same period — about 7,100 — or the number of people who moved out of the state — about
4,400, according to data from the Postal Service.
In Colorado, some 37,000 people were removed from the rolls in the three weeks after July 21. During that time, about
5,100 people moved out of the state and about 2,400 died, according to postal data and death records.
In Louisiana, at least 18,000 people were dropped from the rolls in the five weeks after July 23. Over the same period,
at least 1,600 people moved out of state and at least 3,300 died.
The secretaries of state in Michigan and Colorado did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for the Louisiana
secretary of state said that about half of the numbers of the voters removed from the rolls were people who moved within
the state or who died. The remaining 11,000 or so people seem to have been removed by local officials for other reasons
that were not clear, the spokesman said.
...
On Monday, the Ohio Republican Party filed a motion in federal court against the secretary of state to get the list of
all names that have been flagged by the Social Security database since Jan. 1. The motion seeks to require that any
voter who does not clear up a discrepancy be required to vote using a provisional ballot.
Republicans said in the motion that it is central to American democracy that nonqualified voters be forbidden from
voting.
The Ohio secretary of state, Jennifer Brunner, a Democrat, said in court papers that she believes the Republicans are
seeking grounds to challenge voters and get them removed from the rolls.
Considering that in the past year the state received nearly 290,000 nonmatches, such a plan could have significant
impact at the polls.
*************
ENDS