Bear Stearns in Bankruptcy: Can You Feel Their Pain?
By Dean Baker
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
According to the current plans being crafted in Washington, you will. Bear Stearns, one of the longstanding giants of
Wall Street investment banking, is now on life support, the victim of its own excessive greed and bad judgment.
Apparently, the wizards who run the show at Bear Stearns (I will resist the temptation to use initials) somehow couldn't
see an $8 trillion housing bubble in the US economy. They made highly leveraged bets on assets backed by mortgages.
These bets have turned bad in a big way. Bear Stearns would now have less value than a corner lemonade stand, if not
for the generosity of the Federal Reserve Board. The Fed lent money to Bear Stearns under terms no private lender would
have agreed to. The risk it will end up with a substantial loss on its loans to Bear Stearns is quite large, with no
prospect for any real return on its investment.
This raises the obvious question: Why is the Fed, an agency of the government, using our tax dollars to keep Bear
Stearns and its rich managers and shareholders above water? After all, the government supposedly doesn't have enough
money to provide kids with health care and childcare, to guarantee families decent housing or to meet a long list of
other needs. Why do we have the money to lend tens of billions of dollars to Bear Stearns at below market interest
rates?
There are two points about this bailout that should be clear. First, this is a bailout - we are handing money to Bear
Stearns. Second, we don't have to hand tens of billions of dollars to the country's richest people to save the financial
system.
The politicians will try to do their best to obscure the first point. They say, "we aren't giving them money - we're
lending money and we're getting interest, so the government can make a profit."
This is what politicians tell people who they think are stupid. No private bank would lend money to Bear Stearns at the
same interest rate and under the same terms as the Fed. (We know this for certain; otherwise, Bear Stearns would not
have run to the Fed.) When the government makes a loan at below market interest rates, it is giving away money. People
on Wall Street know this very well, that is how they got to be fabulously rich: They borrow money at a lower interest
rate than they lend it out.
If they can't get away with the "no bailout" nonsense, the Wall Street welfare boys will then try the route of claiming
we have to bail them out in order to prevent the whole financial system from collapsing. Such a collapse could turn the
recession into a depression leaving millions unemployed for years.
This is also nonsense. We know how to keep banks operating even as they go into bankruptcy. England just did this with
Northern Rock, a major bank that managed to get itself into huge trouble because of its holding of bad mortgage debt.
After it was clear the bank was insolvent, the Bank of England stepped in and essentially took over the bank. It
replaced the incompetent managers who had ruined the bank and brought in a new team to straighten out the books. The
plan is to resell the bank to the private sector once the books are in order.
In the meantime, the bank keeps operating. The depositors can continue to make deposits and withdrawals just as before.
This prevents any chain reaction from bringing down the financial system.
The difference between the Northern Rock route and what happened with Bear Stearns last week is that in the Northern
Rock, the highly paid managers that ruined the bank are sent packing. Similarly, the shareholders will get little or
nothing. They own a bankrupt company; why should the government give them money?
As the financial crisis deepens, it is important the public realize the distinction between what the Bank of England
did with Northern Rock and the handout from the Fed to Bear Stearns. There are other banks in serious trouble that are
also looking to the Fed for help.
The best thing the Fed can do is to go the Northern Rock route. Instead of giving more money to troubled banks, it
should give less. It should end the Term Auction Facility and other special mechanisms for injecting money into banks.
The economy will recover quickest if we let the banks and the bankers get the full benefit of their own bad judgment.
When they have written down their bad debts and are taken over by new management, the banks will again be able to play a
productive role in financing growth.
*************
Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get
Richer (www.conservativenannystate.org). He also has a blog, "Beat the Press," where he discusses the media's coverage of economic issues. You can find it at
the American Prospect's web site.