Magazine Says Nelson-Whitehouse Senate Bill Calling for 2012 Ban on Dangerous DRE Voting Systems a 'Stunning Reversal'
Uses Our Own 'Ford Pinto' Metaphor in Article Spurring One Writer to Proclaim to BRAD BLOG: 'DREs Are Now Junk in
Mainstream Publications Such as Time!'
Sure, the reporter at TIME magazine gets much of the terminology wrong (hey, he works for TIME, he doesn't have the kind of resources we do here at The BRAD BLOG to get things right when we report them, so we'll cut him some slack), but as a national writer friend of ours commented in a late-night
email last night, "DREs are now junk, officially, in mainstream publications such as Time.com"
Well, it's about damned time.
Reporting on the new Nelson-Whitehouse Election Reform bill, which we covered late last week, and which would ban Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting systems by 2012, TIME declares that
the reversal, since 2000, away from such unverifiable, unauditable, unsecurable voting machines "couldn't be more stunning," adding that the bill is
"the clearest sign yet of the stampede away from touch-screen."
The report also quotes Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) mirroring his comments when he released the legislation with co-sponsor
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) as saying "Voters have to feel confident that their ballot will count as intended." Last
week he had said, in his statement, that DREs are "unreliable and vulnerable to error," and that "[t]he bottom line is we have to ensure every vote is
counted – and, counted properly."
To which occasional BRAD BLOG Guest Blogger, Emily Levy of VelvetRevolution.us, asked Nelson rhetorically in comments here, if that's true, "as declared in your November 1 statement, why would you be willing to wait until 2012 for DREs to be
banned?...I mean, isn't there a somewhat important election coming up in, oh, let's say, 2008?"
Good point, Em!
The TIME piece also quotes Dan McCrea, of the Florida Voters Coalition borrowing one of our own oft-used metaphors (which we are quite happy to donate to the cause!) in regard to those who fear banning DREs would be a huge
waste of their previous investment in the shitty machines.
McCrea tells TIME that such thinking is similar to "buying a fleet of Pintos whose gas tanks you later find out blow up
on you, but insisting you're going to keep using them because you spent all that money on them."
Thanks for getting that into TIME, Dan! Smartly done!
He also points out, for those who claim there is not enough time to switch away from dangerous DREs to paper ballots
before the November 2008 Presidential Election, "New Mexico voted to convert back to a paper ballot system in the spring
of 2006 and had it ready by last November's elections."
Thanks again, Dan. Now if we can just get those Democrats and Election Integrity folks who continue to negotiate with themselves by watering down their own bills, and putting off reform for years down the road --- in order to garner support from
folks who are going to oppose them on such bills no matter what --- to start realizing that, and calling instead for real reform NOW, we might actually be in business!
********************