Banned From Canada For War Protest
By Ann Wright, retired US Army Colonel and former US diplomat, AfterDowningStreet.org
On the invitation six members of the Canadian Parliament to speak October 25 on Canada’s Parliament Hill as a member of
a panel called “Peacebuilders Without Borders: Challenging the Post-0/11 Canada-US Security Agenda,” I arrived at the
Ottawa airport in the morning of October 25 to be met by three members of Parliament and to hold a press conference at
Medea Benjamin, co-founder of Codepink Women for Peace and Global Exchange, was also invited by the Parliamentarians,
but had been arrested the previous day for holding up two fingers in the form of a peace sign during the US House of
Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing in which Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testified on Iraq,
Iran and Israel-Palestinian issues. The October 24 committee hearing began with Codepink peace activist Desiree Fairooz
holding up her red paint stained hands to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and shouting “The blood of millions of
Iraqis is on your hands.” As Capitol Hill police took her out of the hearing of the House of Representatives’ Committee
on Foreign Affairs, Fairooz yelled over her shoulder “war criminal, take her to the Hague.” Shortly thereafter two
Codepinkers were arrested for just being in the room and brutally hauled out of the hearing by Capitol police. An hour
later Medea and a male Codepinker were arrested for no reason. Four of the five had to stay overnight in the District of
Columbia jail. Medea was one of those and missed the trip to Ottawa.
I presented to immigration officials our letter of invitation from the Parliamentarians that explained that Medea and I
had been denied entry to Canada at the Niagara Falls border crossing on October 3, 2007 because we had been convicted in
the United States of peaceful, non-violent protests against the war on Iraq, including sitting on the sidewalk in front
of the White House with 400 others, speaking out against torture during Congressional hearings, and other misdemeanors.
The Canadian government knew of these offenses as they now have access to the FBI’s National Crime Information database
on which we are listed. The database that was created to identify members of violent gangs and terrorist organizations,
foreign fugitives, patrol violators and sex offenders—not for peace activists peacefully protesting illegal actions of
The immigration officer directed me to secondary screening where my request to call the members of Parliament waiting
outside the customs doors was denied. My suggestion that the letter of invitation from the Parliamentarians might be
valuable in accessing the need for me to be in Canada was dismissed with the comment that members of Parliament do not
have a role in determining who enters Canada. I suggested that the laws enacted by the Parliament were the basis of that
determination. I added that the reason I had been invited to Ottawa by Parliamentarian was to be an example of how
current laws may exclude those whom Canadians may wish to allow to enter. I also mentioned that Parliament might decide
to change the laws that immigration officials implement. I also suggested that since the Parliament provides the budget
to the Immigration Services, they might notify the Parliamentarians awaiting my arrival that I had been detained. The
officers declined to do so citing my privacy, which I immediately waived. The Parliamentarians were never notified by
Immigration that I had arrived and was being detained. Only when my cell phone was returned to me by Immigration
officers four hours later was I able to make contact with the Parliamentarians.
After nearly four hours of interrogation, I was told by the senior immigration officer that I was banned from Canada for
one year for failure to provide appropriate documents that would overcome the exclusion order I had been given in early
October because of conviction of misdemeanors (all payable by fines) in the United States. The officer said that to
apply for a Temporary Resident Permit (TRP) for entry for a specific event on a specific date, I must provide to a
Canadian Embassy or consulate the arresting officer’s report, court transcripts and court documents for each of the
convictions and an official document describing the termination of sentences, a police certificate issued within the
last three months by the FBI, police certificates from places I have lived in the past ten years (that includes Sierra
Leone, Micronesia, Afghanistan and Mongolia), a letter acknowledging my convictions from three respected members of the
community (the respected members that I will ask to write a letter all been convicted of similar “offenses”) and a
completed 18 page “criminal rehabilitation” packet.
Additionally, besides obtaining the Temporary Resident Permit, since I was being banned for a year from Canada, I would
have to obtain a “Canadian Government Minister’s consent.” The officer said that the TRP and the Minister’s consent
normally took from 8-10 months to obtain. In the distant future, to be able to enter Canada without a TRP, I would have
to have to be “criminally rehabilitated" and be free for five years of conviction of any offense, including for peaceful
The senior immigration officer took my fingerprints for Canadian records, escorted me to the airport departures area and
placed me on the first plane departing for Washington, DC. In the meantime, the members of Parliament conducted the
press conference and the panel without my presence but certainly using the example of what had happened to me and
previously to Medea Benjamin as incidents that the Parliamentarians are very concerned about, specifically their
government’s wholesale acceptance of information on the FBI’s database, information that appears to have been placed
there for political intimidation.
A participant on the Parliamentary panel that I was unable to attend was Monia Mazigh, the wife of Canadian citizen
Maher Arar who was sent by US authorities when he transited New York’s JFK airport, to Syria where he was imprisoned and
tortured for 10 months. The day before I arrived at the Ottawa airport, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice acknowledged
that the United States had “not handled his case properly.” But Rice did not apologize to Arar on behalf of the Bush
administration during testimony to the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee. The previous week during a
video conference, both Republican and Democrat members of Congress offered apologies to Arar. Arar, an Ottawa
telecommunications engineer, still has a lawsuit pending against American officials. Arguments are scheduled for Nov. 9
in New York.
Many countries have succumbed to the behind the scenes 9-11 pressure of the Bush administration to enact extensive and
expansive anti-terrorism laws to increase “harmonization” and integration of security measures among countries.
Unfortunately, the Canadian government is mirroring the Bush administration’s use of security measures to increase
control over dissent in their country—and in other countries.
Most of the new security measures are done through administrative agreements, international joint working groups,
regulations and the use of international organizations such as the G-8 and the International Civil Aviation
Organization. By using administrative regulations, the U.S. and Canadian governments avoid opening up the proposed
restrictions of personal privacy to public scrutiny and debate by preventing such regulations from being enacted in the
Congress or Parliament.
Through these agreements with Canada and other G-8 countries, the Bush administration is setting up a global
infrastructure for the registration and surveillance of populations worldwide, looking at every person as a suspect and
a risk, whom must in their opinion, as a precaution, be identified and tracked. Ordinary legal protections fundamental
to democratic societies such as the presumption of innocence, rights against unreasonable search and seizure and rights
against arbitrary detention and punishment are greatly threatened by these precautionary measures.
Countries are accepting the “precautionary principle” and are gathering and sharing information not only to track
suspected “terrorists” but to stop dissidents from flying and/or entering other countries, to stop activists and
intellectuals at borders (the Bush administration has refused visas for numerous academics from all over the world who
have been invited to teach at American universities but whom have spoken and written against the Bush war in Iraq,
torture and other violations of international law), to detain persons without reasonable grounds and to send persons to
third countries and prisons operated by the US government, where are detained indefinitely without charge, tortured and
are sometimes murdered.
The Canada-U.S. Smart Border Agreement and Action Plan, an administrative agreement signed in December 2001, is the
master document for security integration between Canada and the United States. The agreement calls for biometric
standards for identity cards, coordinated visa an refugee policy, coordinate risk assessment of travelers, integrated
border and marine enforcement teams, integrated national security intelligence teams, coordinated terrorist lists,
increased intelligence sharing and joint efforts to promote the Canada-US model internationally.
After 9-11 the Bush administration, under the National Security Entry-exit Registration System (NSEERS) registered and
took biometric identifiers (fingerprints) of all males age 16-45 with links to Muslim and Arab countries visiting or
traveling though the United States. Next, persons applying for visas to visit the United States had to submit biometric
data (fingerprints) that will be stored in a US database for 100 years through the new U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status
Indication Technology (US-VISIT) program.
The Bush administration expanded its biometric round-up on a global scale in 2002 by requiring all countries that want
to retain their visa waiver status with the U.S. to require by 2004 biometric passports through the Enhanced Border
Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002. In 2004 the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) set a face
recognition standard with fingerprint and iris scans as optional standards. Beginning in 2005 the United States and
Canada have biometric passports with facial recognition.
We all want our countries to be safe from criminal actions. However, the unnecessary curtailment of civil liberties and
purposeful targeting of those who disagree with government policies must end.
I call on the US Congress to conduct hearings to determine who ordered the FBI to place peaceful, non-violence protest
convictions on the international data base and for what purpose.
It feels to me like purposeful intimidation to stop dissent—but I can guarantee you, it won’t work!
To all those concerned about free speech, freedom to travel, ending an illegal war, stopping torture and other
violations of domestic and international law, come to Washington and help us!!!
(For more extensive information on security agreements that unnecessarily jeopardize our civil liberties, please see
“Americanizing the Restriction of Canadians’ Rights—Security Overtaking Trade as a Driver of ‘Deep Integration’,” by
Maureen Webb, Canadian centre for Policy Alternatives (www.policyalternatives.ca/MonitorIssues/2006/04/
About the Author: Ann Wright is a 29 year US Army veteran who retired as a Colonel and a former US diplomat who resigned
in March, 2003 in opposition to the war on Iraq. She served in Nicaragua, Grenada, Somalia, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan,
Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Mongolia. In December, 2001 she was on the small team that reopened the US Embassy in
Kabul, Afghanistan. The US Department of State has delayed for over three months publication of her new book “Dissent:
Voices of Conscience.” It will be published whenever the State Department finishes its search for classified materials.