Gary Webb's Death: American Tragedy
Saturday 09 December 2006
When Americans ask me what happened to the vaunted U.S. press corps over the past three decades - in the decline from
its heyday of the Watergate scandal and the Pentagon Papers to its failure to challenge the Iraq WMD lies or to hold
George W. Bush accountable - I often recall for them the story of Gary Webb.
Two years ago, on the night of Dec. 9, 2004, investigative reporter Webb - his career shattered and his life in ruins -
typed out four suicide notes for his family, laid out a certificate for his cremation, put a note on the door suggesting
a call to 911, and removed his father's handgun from a box.
The 49-year-old Webb, a divorced father of three who was living alone in a rental house in Sacramento County,
California, then raised the gun and shot himself in the head. The first shot was not lethal, so he fired once more.
His body was found the next day after movers who were scheduled to clear out Webb's rental house, arrived and followed
the instructions from the note on the door.
Though a personal tragedy, the story of Gary Webb's suicide has a larger meaning for the American people who find
themselves increasingly sheltered from the truth by government specialists at cover-ups and by a U.S. news media that
has lost its way.
Webb's death had its roots in his fateful decision eight years earlier to write a three-part series for the San Jose
Mercury News that challenged a potent conventional wisdom shared by the elite U.S. news organizations - that one of the
most shocking scandals of the 1980s just couldn't have been true.
Webb's "Dark Alliance" series, published in August 1996, revived the story of how the Reagan administration in the
1980s had tolerated and protected cocaine smuggling by its client army of Nicaraguan rebels known as the contras.
Though substantial evidence of these crimes had surfaced in the mid-1980s (initially in an article that Brian Barger
and I wrote for the Associated Press in December 1985 and later at hearings conducted by Sen. John Kerry), the major
news outlets had bent to pressure from the Reagan administration and refused to take the disclosures seriously.
Reflecting the dominant attitude toward Kerry and his work on the contra-cocaine scandal, Newsweek even dubbed the
Massachusetts senator a "randy conspiracy buff." [For details, see Consortiumnews.com's "Kerry's Contra-Cocaine
Thus, the ugly reality of the contra-cocaine scandal was left in that netherworld of uncertainty, largely proven with
documents and testimony but never accepted by Official Washington, including its premier news organizations, such as the
New York Times and the Washington Post.
But Webb's series thrust the scandal back into prominence by connecting the contra-cocaine trafficking to the crack
epidemic that had ravaged Los Angeles and other American cities in the 1980s. For that reason, African-American
communities were up in arms as were their elected representatives.
So, the "Dark Alliance" series offered a unique opportunity for the major news outlets to finally give the
contra-cocaine scandal the attention it deserved.
But that would have required some painful self-criticism among Washington journalists whose careers had advanced in
part because they had avoided retaliation from aggressive Reagan supporters who had made an art of punishing out-of-step
reporters for pursuing controversies like the contra-cocaine scandal.
Also, by the mid-1990s, a powerful right-wing news media had taken shape and was in no mood to accept the notion that
President Ronald Reagan's beloved contras were little more than common criminals. That recognition would have cast a
shadow over the Reagan Legacy, which the Right was busy elevating into mythic status.
There was the turf issue, too. Since Webb's stories coincided with the emergence of the Internet as an alternate source
for news and the San Jose Mercury News was at the center of Silicon Valley, the big newspapers saw a threat to their
historic dominance as the nation's gatekeepers for what information should be taken seriously.
Plus, the major media's focus in the mid-1990s was on scandals swirling around Bill Clinton, such as some firings at
the White House Travel Office and convoluted questions about his old Whitewater real-estate deal.
In other words, there was little appetite to revisit scandals from the Reagan years and there was strong motive to
disparage what Webb had written.
It fell to Rev. Sun Myung Moon's right-wing Washington Times to begin the counterattack. The Washington Times turned to
some ex-CIA officials, who had participated in the contra war, to refute the drug charges.
But - in a pattern that would repeat itself over the next decade - the Washington Post and other mainstream newspapers
quickly lined up behind the right-wing press. On Oct. 4, 1996, the Washington Post published a front-page article
knocking down Webb's story.
The Post's approach was twofold: first, it presented the contra-cocaine allegations as old news - "even CIA personnel
testified to Congress they knew that those covert operations involved drug traffickers," the Post reported - and second,
the Post minimized the importance of the one contra smuggling channel that Webb had highlighted - that it had not
"played a major role in the emergence of crack."
A Post side-bar story dismissed African-Americans as prone to "conspiracy fears."
Soon, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times joined in the piling on against Gary Webb. The big newspapers made
much of the CIA's internal reviews in 1987 and 1988 that supposedly cleared the spy agency of a role in contra-cocaine
But the CIA's decade-old cover-up began to weaken on Oct. 24, 1996, when CIA Inspector General Frederick Hitz conceded
before the Senate Intelligence Committee that the first CIA probe had lasted only 12 days, the second only three days.
He promised a more thorough review.
Nevertheless, Webb was becoming the target of outright media ridicule. Influential Post media critic Howard Kurtz
mocked Webb for saying in a book proposal that he would explore the possibility that the contra war was primarily a
business to its participants.
"Oliver Stone, check your voice mail," Kurtz chortled. [Washington Post, Oct. 28, 1996]
Webb's suspicion was not unfounded, however. Indeed, White House aide Oliver North's emissary Rob Owen had made the
same point a decade earlier, in a March 17, 1986, message about the contra leadership.
"Few of the so-called leaders of the movement … really care about the boys in the field," Owen wrote. "THIS WAR HAS
BECOME A BUSINESS TO MANY OF THEM." [Capitalization in the original.]
Kurtz and other big-name journalists may have been ignorant of key facts about the contra war, but that didn't stop
them from pillorying Gary Webb. The ridicule also had a predictable effect on the executives of the Mercury News. By
early 1997, executive editor Jerry Ceppos was in retreat.
On May 11, 1997, Ceppos published a front-page column saying the series "fell short of my standards." He criticized the
stories because they "strongly implied CIA knowledge" of contra connections to U.S. drug dealers who were manufacturing
crack-cocaine. "We did not have proof that top CIA officials knew of the relationship," Ceppos wrote.
The big newspapers celebrated Ceppos's retreat as vindication of their own dismissal of the contra-cocaine stories.
Ceppos next pulled the plug on the Mercury News' continuing contra-cocaine investigation and reassigned Webb to a small
office in Cupertino, California, far from his family. Webb resigned the paper in disgrace.
For undercutting Webb and other reporters working on the contra investigation, Ceppos was lauded by the American
Journalism Review and was given the 1997 national "Ethics in Journalism Award" by the Society of Professional
Journalists. While Ceppos won raves, Webb watched his career collapse and his marriage break up.
The CIA Probe
Still, Gary Webb had set in motion internal government investigations that would bring to the surface long-hidden facts
about how the Reagan administration had conducted the contra war.
The CIA's defensive line against the contra-cocaine allegations began to break when the spy agency published Volume One
of Inspector General Hitz's findings on Jan. 29, 1998.
Despite a largely exculpatory press release, Hitz's Volume One admitted that not only were many of Webb's allegations
true but that he actually understated the seriousness of the contra-drug crimes and the CIA's knowledge.
Hitz acknowledged that cocaine smugglers played a significant early role in the Nicaraguan contra movement and that the
CIA intervened to block an image-threatening 1984 federal investigation into a San Francisco-based drug ring with
suspected ties to the contras, the so-called "Frogman Case."
On May 7, 1998, another disclosure from the government investigation shook the CIA's weakening defenses.
Rep. Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, introduced into the Congressional Record a Feb. 11, 1982, letter of
understanding between the CIA and the Justice Department.
The letter, which had been sought by CIA Director William Casey, freed the CIA from legal requirements that it must
report drug smuggling by CIA assets, a provision that covered both the Nicaraguan contras and Afghan rebels who were
fighting a Soviet-supported regime in Afghanistan and were implicated in heroin trafficking.
The next breach in the defensive wall was a report by the Justice Department's inspector general Michael Bromwich.
Given the hostile climate surrounding Webb's series, Bromwich's report opened with criticism of Webb. But, like the
CIA's Volume One, the contents revealed new details about government wrongdoing.
According to evidence cited by Bromwich, the Reagan administration knew almost from the outset of the contra war that
cocaine traffickers permeated the paramilitary operation. The administration also did next to nothing to expose or stop
Bromwich's report revealed example after example of leads not followed, corroborated witnesses disparaged, official
law-enforcement investigations sabotaged, and even the CIA facilitating the work of drug traffickers.
The report showed that the contras and their supporters ran several parallel drug-smuggling operations, not just the
one at the center of Webb's series.
The report also found that the CIA shared little of its information about contra drugs with law-enforcement agencies
and on three occasions disrupted cocaine-trafficking investigations that threatened the contras.
Though depicting a more widespread contra-drug operation than Webb had understood, the Justice report also provided
some important corroboration about a Nicaraguan drug smuggler, Norwin Meneses, who was a key figure in Webb's series.
Bromwich cited U.S. government informants who supplied detailed information about Meneses's operation and his financial
assistance to the contras.
For instance, Renato Pena, a money-and-drug courier for Meneses, said that in the early 1980s, the CIA allowed the
contras to fly drugs into the United States, sell them and keep the proceeds.
Pena, who was the northern California representative for the CIA-backed FDN contra army, said the drug trafficking was
forced on the contras by the inadequate levels of U.S. government assistance.
The Justice report also disclosed repeated examples of the CIA and U.S. embassies in Central America discouraging Drug
Enforcement Administration investigations, including one into contra-cocaine shipments moving through the international
airport in El Salvador.
Inspector General Bromwich said secrecy trumped all. "We have no doubt that the CIA and the U.S. Embassy were not
anxious for the DEA to pursue its investigation at the airport," he wrote.
Despite the remarkable admissions in the body of these reports, the big newspapers showed no inclination to read beyond
the press releases and executive summaries.
Cocaine Crimes & Monica
By fall 1998, Official Washington was obsessed with the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, which made it easier to ignore
even more stunning contra-cocaine disclosures in the CIA's Volume Two.
In Volume Two, published Oct. 8, 1998, CIA Inspector General Hitz identified more than 50 contras and contra-related
entities implicated in the drug trade. He also detailed how the Reagan administration had protected these drug
operations and frustrated federal investigations throughout the 1980s.
According to Volume Two, the CIA knew the criminal nature of its contra clients from the start of the war against
Nicaragua's leftist Sandinista government.
The earliest contra force, called ADREN or the 15th of September Legion, had chosen "to stoop to criminal activities in
order to feed and clothe their cadre," according to a June 1981 draft CIA field report.
ADREN also employed terrorist methods, including the bombing of Nicaraguan civilian planes and hijackings, to disrupt
the Sandinista government, the CIA knew. Cocaine smuggling was also in the picture.
According to a September 1981 cable to CIA headquarters, two ADREN members made the first delivery of drugs to Miami in
July 1981, the CIA cable reported.
ADREN's leaders included Enrique Bermudez and other early contras who would later direct the major contra army, the
CIA-organized FDN. Throughout the war, Bermudez remained the top contra military commander.
The CIA later corroborated the allegations about ADREN's cocaine trafficking, but insisted that Bermudez had opposed
the drug shipments to the United States which went ahead nonetheless.
The truth about Bermudez's supposed objections to drug trafficking, however, was less clear. According to Volume One,
Bermudez enlisted Norwin Meneses, a large-scale Nicaraguan cocaine smuggler, to raise money and buy supplies for the
Volume One had quoted a Meneses associate, another Nicaraguan trafficker named Danilo Blandon, who told Hitz's
investigators that he and Meneses flew to Honduras to meet with Bermudez in 1982.
At the time, Meneses's criminal activities were well known in the Nicaraguan exile community. But the FDN commander
told the cocaine smugglers that "the ends justify the means" in raising money for the contras.
After the Bermudez meeting, contra soldiers helped Meneses and Blandon get past Honduran police who briefly arrested
them on drug-trafficking suspicions. After their release, Blandon and Meneses traveled on to Bolivia to complete a
There were other indications of Bermudez's drug-smuggling tolerance. In February 1988, another Nicaraguan exile linked
to the drug trade accused Bermudez of narcotics trafficking, according to Hitz's report.
After the contra war ended, Bermudez returned to Managua, where he was shot to death on Feb. 16, 1991. The murder has
never been solved.
CIA Drug Asset
Along the Southern Front, in Costa Rica, the drug evidence centered on the forces of Eden Pastora, another leading
contra commander. But Hitz discovered that the U.S. government may have contributed to the problem.
Hitz revealed that the CIA put an admitted drug operative - known by his CIA pseudonym "Ivan Gomez" - in a supervisory
position over Pastora. Hitz reported that the CIA discovered Gomez's drug history in 1987 when Gomez failed a security
review on drug-trafficking questions.
In internal CIA interviews, Gomez admitted that in March or April 1982, he helped family members who were engaged in
drug trafficking and money laundering. In one case, Gomez said he assisted his brother and brother-in-law in
transporting cash from New York City to Miami. He admitted that he "knew this act was illegal."
Later, Gomez expanded on his admission, describing how his family members had fallen $2 million into debt and had gone
to Miami to run a money-laundering center for drug traffickers. Gomez said "his brother had many visitors whom [Gomez]
assumed to be in the drug trafficking business."
Gomez's brother was arrested on drug charges in June 1982. Three months later, in September 1982, Gomez started his CIA
assignment in Costa Rica. Years later, convicted drug trafficker Carlos Cabezas charged that in the early 1980s, Ivan
Gomez was the CIA agent in Costa Rica who was overseeing drug-money donations to the contras.
Gomez "was to make sure the money was given to the right people [the contras] and nobody was taking ... profit they
weren't supposed to," Cabezas stated publicly.
But the CIA sought to discredit Cabezas at the time because he had trouble identifying Gomez's picture and put Gomez at
one meeting in early 1982 before Gomez started his CIA assignment.
While the CIA was able to fend off Cabezas's allegations by pointing to these discrepancies, Hitz's report revealed
that the CIA was nevertheless aware of Gomez's direct role in drug-money laundering, a fact the agency hid from Sen.
Kerry's investigation in 1987.
The Bolivian Connection
There also was more about Gomez. In November 1985, the FBI learned from an informant that Gomez's two brothers had been
large-scale cocaine importers, with one brother arranging shipments from Bolivia's infamous drug kingpin Roberto Suarez.
Suarez already was known as a financier of right-wing causes. In 1980, with the support of Argentine's hard-line
anti-communist military regime, Suarez bankrolled a coup in Bolivia that ousted the elected left-of-center government.
The violent putsch became known as the Cocaine Coup because it made Bolivia the region's first narco-state. Bolivia's
government-protected cocaine shipments helped transform the Medellin cartel from a struggling local operation into a
giant corporate-style business for delivering cocaine to the U.S. market.
Some of those profits allegedly found their way into contra coffers. Flush with cash in the early 1980s, Suarez
invested more than $30 million in various right-wing paramilitary operations, including the contra forces in Central
America, according to U.S. Senate testimony by an Argentine intelligence officer, Leonardo Sanchez-Reisse.
In 1987, Sanchez-Reisse said the Suarez drug money was laundered through front companies in Miami before going to
Central America. There, other Argentine intelligence officers - veterans of the Bolivian coup - trained the contras.
CIA Inspector General Hitz added another piece to the mystery of the Bolivian-contra connection. One contra
fund-raiser, Jose Orlando Bolanos, boasted that the Argentine government was supporting his anti-Sandinista activities,
according to a May 1982 cable to CIA headquarters.
Bolanos made the statement during a meeting with undercover Drug Enforcement Administration agents in Florida. He even
offered to introduce them to his Bolivian cocaine supplier.
Despite all this suspicious drug activity around Ivan Gomez and the contras, the CIA insisted that it did not unmask
Gomez until 1987, when he failed a security check and confessed his role in his family's drug business.
The CIA official who interviewed Gomez concluded that "Gomez directly participated in illegal drug transactions,
concealed participation in illegal drug transactions, and concealed information about involvement in illegal drug
activity," Hitz wrote.
But senior CIA officials still protected Gomez. They refused to refer the Gomez case to the Justice Department, citing
the 1982 DOJ-CIA agreement that spared the CIA from a legal obligation to report narcotics crimes by non-employees.
Instead, the CIA eased Gomez, an independent contractor, out of the agency in February 1988, without alerting law
enforcement or the congressional oversight committees.
When questioned about the case nearly a decade later, one senior CIA official who had supported the gentle treatment of
Gomez had second thoughts. "It is a striking commentary on me and everyone that this guy's involvement in narcotics
didn't weigh more heavily on me or the system," the official acknowledged.
The White House Trail
A Medellin drug connection arose in another section of Hitz's report, when he revealed evidence suggesting that some
contra trafficking may have been sanctioned by Reagan's National Security Council.
The protagonist for this part of the contra-cocaine mystery was Moises Nunez, a Cuban-American who worked for North's
NSC operation and for two drug-connected seafood importers, Ocean Hunter in Miami and Frigorificos de Puntarenas in
Frigorificos de Puntarenas was created in the early 1980s as a cover for drug-money laundering, according to sworn
testimony by two of the firm's principals - Carlos Soto and Medellin cartel accountant Ramon Milian Rodriguez. Drug
allegations were swirling around Moises Nunez by the mid-1980s. At the AP, his operation was one of the targets of our
Finally reacting to these suspicions, the CIA questioned Nunez on March 25, 1987, about his alleged cocaine
trafficking. He responded by pointing the finger at his NSC superiors.
"Nunez revealed that since 1985, he had engaged in a clandestine relationship with the National Security Council," Hitz
"Nunez refused to elaborate on the nature of these actions, but indicated it was difficult to answer questions relating
to his involvement in narcotics trafficking because of the specific tasks he had performed at the direction of the NSC.
Nunez refused to identify the NSC officials with whom he had been involved."
After this first round of questioning, CIA headquarters authorized an additional session, but then senior CIA officials
reversed the decision. There would be no further efforts at "debriefing Nunez."
Hitz noted that "the cable [from headquarters] offered no explanation for the decision" to stop the Nunez
But the CIA's Central American task force chief Alan Fiers said the Nunez-NSC drug lead was not pursued "because of the
NSC connection and the possibility that this could be somehow connected to the Private Benefactor program [the contra
money handled by North]. A decision was made not to pursue this matter."
Joseph Fernandez, who had been the CIA's station chief in Costa Rica, later confirmed to congressional Iran-Contra
investigators that Nunez "was involved in a very sensitive operation" for North's "Enterprise." The exact nature of that
NSC-authorized activity has never been divulged.
At the time of the Nunez-NSC drug admissions and his truncated interrogation, the CIA's acting director was Robert M.
Gates, who was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on Dec. 6, 2006, to be President George W. Bush's new Secretary of Defense.
The CIA also worked directly with other drug-connected Cuban-Americans on the contra project, Hitz found.
One of Nunez's Cuban-American associates, Felipe Vidal, had a criminal record as a narcotics trafficker in the 1970s.
But the CIA still hired him to serve as a logistics coordinator for the contras, Hitz reported.
The CIA also learned that Vidal's drug connections were not only in the past.
A December 1984 cable to CIA headquarters revealed Vidal's ties to Rene Corvo, another Cuban-American suspected of drug
trafficking. Corvo was working with anti-communist Cuban, Frank Castro, who was viewed as a Medellin cartel
representative within the contra movement.
There were other narcotics links to Vidal. In January 1986, the DEA in Miami seized 414 pounds of cocaine concealed in
a shipment of yucca that was going from a contra operative in Costa Rica to Ocean Hunter, the company where Vidal
Despite the evidence, Vidal remained a CIA employee as he collaborated with Frank Castro's assistant, Rene Corvo, in
raising money for the contras, according to a CIA memo in June 1986.
By fall 1986, Sen. Kerry had heard enough rumors about Vidal to demand information about him as part of a congressional
inquiry into contra drugs. But the CIA withheld the derogatory information. On Oct. 15, 1986, Kerry received a briefing
from Alan Fiers, who didn't mention Vidal's drug arrests and conviction in the 1970s.
But Vidal was not yet in the clear. In 1987, the U.S. attorney in Miami began investigating Vidal, Ocean Hunter and
other contra-connected entities.
This prosecutorial attention worried the CIA. The CIA's Latin American division felt it was time for a security review
of Vidal. But on Aug. 5, 1987, the CIA's security office blocked the review for fear that the Vidal drug information
"could be exposed during any future litigation."
As expected, the U.S. Attorney did request documents about "contra-related activities" by Vidal, Ocean Hunter and 16
other entities. The CIA advised the prosecutor that "no information had been found regarding Ocean Hunter," a statement
that was clearly false.
The CIA continued Vidal's employment as an adviser to the contra movement until 1990, virtually the end of the contra
Hitz revealed that drugs also tainted the highest levels of the Honduran-based FDN, the largest contra army.
Hitz found that Juan Rivas, a contra commander who rose to be chief of staff, admitted that he had been a cocaine
trafficker in Colombia before the war. The CIA asked Rivas, known as El Quiche, about his background after the DEA began
suspecting that Rivas might be an escaped convict from a Colombian prison.
In interviews with CIA officers, Rivas acknowledged that he had been arrested and convicted of packaging and
transporting cocaine for the drug trade in Barranquilla, Colombia. After several months in prison, Rivas said, he
escaped and moved to Central America where he joined the contras.
Defending Rivas, CIA officials insisted that there was no evidence that Rivas engaged in trafficking while with the
contras. But one CIA cable noted that he lived an expensive lifestyle, even keeping a $100,000 thoroughbred horse at the
Contra military commander Bermudez later attributed Rivas's wealth to his ex-girlfriend's rich family. But a CIA cable
in March 1989 added that "some in the FDN may have suspected at the time that the father-in-law was engaged in drug
Still, the CIA moved quickly to protect Rivas from exposure and possible extradition to Colombia. In February 1989, CIA
headquarters asked that DEA take no action "in view of the serious political damage to the U.S. Government that could
occur should the information about Rivas become public."
Rivas was eased out of the contra leadership with an explanation of poor health. With U.S. government help, he was
allowed to resettle in Miami. Colombia was not informed about his fugitive status.
Another senior FDN official implicated in the drug trade was its chief spokesman in Honduras, Arnoldo Jose "Frank"
The drug allegations against Arana dated back to 1983 when a federal narcotics task force put him under criminal
investigation because of plans "to smuggle 100 kilograms of cocaine into the United States from South America."
On Jan. 23, 1986, the FBI reported that Arana and his brothers were involved in a drug-smuggling enterprise, although
Arana was not charged.
Arana sought to clear up another set of drug suspicions in 1989 by visiting the DEA in Honduras with a business
associate, Jose Perez. Arana's association with Perez, however, only raised new alarms.
If "Arana is mixed up with the Perez brothers, he is probably dirty," the DEA responded.
Through their ownership of an air services company called SETCO, the Perez brothers were associated with Juan Matta
Ballesteros, a major cocaine kingpin connected to the murder of a DEA agent, according to reports by the DEA and U.S.
Hitz reported that someone at the CIA scribbled a note on the DEA cable about Arana stating: "Arnold Arana ... still
active and working, we [CIA] may have a problem."
Despite its drug ties to Matta Ballesteros, SETCO emerged as the principal company for ferrying supplies to the contras
During congressional Iran-Contra hearings, FDN political leader Adolfo Calero testified that SETCO was paid from bank
accounts controlled by Oliver North. SETCO also received $185,924 from the State Department for ferrying supplies to the
contras in 1986.
Hitz found other air transport companies used by the contras implicated in the cocaine trade. Even FDN leaders
suspected that they were shipping supplies to Central America aboard planes that might be returning with drugs.
Mario Calero, Adolfo Calero's brother and the chief of contra logistics, grew so uneasy about one air-freight company
that he notified U.S. law enforcement that the FDN only chartered the planes for the flights south, not the return
Hitz found that some drug pilots simply rotated from one sector of the contra operation to another. Donaldo Frixone,
who had a drug record in the Dominican Republic, was hired by the CIA to fly contra missions from 1983-85.
In September 1986, however, Frixone was implicated in smuggling 19,000 pounds of marijuana into the United States. In
late 1986 or early 1987, he went to work for Vortex, another U.S.-paid contra supply company linked to the drug trade.
By the time that Hitz's Volume Two was published in fall 1998, the CIA's defense against Webb's series had shrunk to a
fig leaf: that the CIA did not conspire with the contras to raise money through cocaine trafficking.
But Hitz made clear that the contra war took precedence over law enforcement and that the CIA withheld evidence of
contra crimes from the Justice Department, the Congress and even the CIA's own analytical division.
Besides tracing the evidence of contra-drug trafficking through the decade-long contra war, the inspector general
interviewed senior CIA officers who acknowledged that they were aware of the contra-drug problem but didn't want its
exposure to undermine the struggle to overthrow Nicaragua's leftist Sandinista government.
According to Hitz, the CIA had "one overriding priority: to oust the Sandinista government. … [CIA officers] were
determined that the various difficulties they encountered not be allowed to prevent effective implementation of the
One CIA field officer explained, "The focus was to get the job done, get the support and win the war."
Hitz also recounted complaints from CIA analysts that CIA operations officers handling the contras hid evidence of
contra-drug trafficking even from the CIA's analysts.
Because of the withheld evidence, the CIA analysts incorrectly concluded in the mid-1980s that "only a handful of
contras might have been involved in drug trafficking." That false assessment was passed on to Congress and the major
news organizations - serving as an important basis for denouncing Gary Webb and his series in 1996.
Nevertheless, although Hitz's report was an extraordinary admission of institutional guilt by the CIA, it passed almost
unnoticed by the big newspapers. [For more details, see Robert Parry's Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth']
On Oct. 10, 1998, two days after Hitz's report was posted at the CIA's Internet site, the New York Times published a
brief article that continued to deride Webb but acknowledged the contra-drug problem may have been worse than earlier
Several weeks later, the Washington Post weighed in with a similarly superficial article. The Los Angeles Times never
published a story on the release of the CIA's Volume Two.
To this day, no editor or reporter who missed the contra-cocaine story has been punished for his or her negligence.
Indeed, some of them are now top executives at their news organizations. On the other hand, Gary Webb's career never
Unable to find decent-paying work in a profession where his past awards included a Pulitzer Prize, Webb grew
despondent. His marriage broke up. By December 2004, he found himself forced to move out of his rented house near
Instead, Webb decided to end his life.
One Last Chance
Webb's suicide offered the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times one more opportunity to set
matters right, to revisit the CIA's admissions in 1998 and to exact some accountability on the Reagan-era officials
implicated in protecting the contra crimes.
But all that followed Gary Webb's death was more trashing of Gary Webb. The Los Angeles Times ran a graceless obituary
that made no mention of the admissions in the CIA's Volume Two and treated Webb like a low-life criminal, rather than a
journalist who took on a tough story and paid a high price.
The Times obituary was republished in other newspapers, including the Washington Post. No one reading this obit would
understand the profound debt that American history owed to Gary Webb, who deserved the lion's share of the credit for
forcing the CIA to make its extraordinary admissions.
Yet, the big media's consistent mishandling of the contra-cocaine scandal in the 1980s and 1990s carried another
warning that the nation missed: that the U.S. press corps was no longer capable of reporting complex crimes of state.
That unaddressed danger returned with disastrous results in late 2002 and early 2003 when George W. Bush sold false
stories about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction while the major newspapers acted as cheerleaders and
At the time of Webb's death on Dec. 9, 2004, the full scope of the Iraq disaster was still not evident, nor was the
major press corps ready to acknowledge that its cowardice in the 1980s and its fecklessness in the 1990s were the direct
antecedents to its complicity in the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Gary Webb had been a kind of canary in the mine shaft. His career destruction in the 1990s and his desperate act of
suicide in 2004 were warnings about grave dangers that, if left ignored, would wreak even worse havoc on the United
States and the world.
But - on this second anniversary of Webb's death - it should be remembered that his great gift to American history was
that he, along with angry African-American citizens, forced the government to admit some of the worst crimes ever
condoned by any White House: the protection of drug smuggling into the United States as part of a covert war against a
country, Nicaragua, that represented no real threat to Americans.
It is way past time for that reality - and that gift - to be acknowledged.
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book,
Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com
. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & "Project Truth."