Korea and the "Axis of Evil"
October 12, 2006
Global Research Editor's Note
This text by Vietnam War Veteran, author and peace activist Brian Willson was first published by Global Research in
2002. It outlines, what most people in America do not know and which is particularly relevant in assessing the alleged
"threats" of North Korea to global security.
North Korea lost thirty percent of its population as a result of US led bombings in the 1950s. US military sources
confirm that 20 percent of north koreas' population was killed off over a three period of intensive bombings:
"After destroying North Korea's 78 cities and thousands of her villages, and killing countless numbers of her civilians,
[General] LeMay remarked, "Over a period of three years or so we killed off - what - twenty percent of the population."6
It is now believed that the population north of the imposed 38th Parallel lost nearly a third its population of 8 - 9
million people during the 37-month long "hot" war, 1950 - 1953, perhaps an unprecedented percentage of mortality
suffered by one nation due to the belligerance of another."
During The Second World War the United Kingdom lost 0.94% of its population, France lost 1.35%, China lost 1.89% and the
US lost 0.32%. During the Korean war, North Korea lost 30 % of its population.
These figures of civilian deaths in North Korea should also be compared to those compiled for Iraq by the Lancet Study
(John Hopkins School of Public Health). The Lancet study estimates a total of 655,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, following
the US led invasion (March 2003- June 2006).
- Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 12 October 2006
**********
Korea and the "Axis of Evil"
The demonization of North Korea by the United States government continues unrelentlessly. The wealthy oil and baseball
man who claims to be president of the United States, used his first State of the Union address on January 29, 2002 to
brand perennial enemy North Korea, along with former allies Iran and Iraq, as "the world’s most dangerous regimes" who
now now form a threatening "axis of evil." Unbeknown to the public, because it was intended to have remained a secret
(whoops!), was the fact that this claimed president presented a "Nuclear Posture Review" report to Congress only three
weeks earlier, on January 8, which ordered the Pentagon to prepare contingency plans for use of nuclear weapons. The
first designated targets for nuclear attack were his newly identified members of the "axis of evil," along with four
other lucky nations as well – Syria, Libya, Russia, and China. That this is nothing short of a policy of ultimate terror
remains unaddressed in the U.S. media.
That Koreans are deeply concerned is an understatement. However, they understand the context in which their "evil" is
being portrayed, not an altogether new threat levelled at them. However, the dangerous escalation of policy rhetoric
following the 9-11 tragedy now boldly warns the world of virtual total war. Vice-president Richard Cheney, another oil
man from Texas, declares that the U.S. is now considering military actions against forty to fifty nations, and that the
war "may never end" and "become a permanent part of the way we live."1 The Pentagon has declared that the widening gap
between the "Haves" and "Have-nots" poses a serious challenge to the U.S., requiring a doctrine of "full spectrum
dominance." Thus, the U.S. demands total capacity to conquer every place and its inhabitants in and around the Earth,
from deep underground bunkers, including those in North Korea and Iraq, through land, sea, and air, to outer space. All
options for achieving global and spatial hegemony are now on the table. Already, the U.S. military is deployed in 100
different countries.2 Total war, permanent war. Terror!
Addiction to use of terror by the United States is nothing new. The civilization was founded and has been sustained by
use of terror as a primary policy. For example, in 1779, General George Washington ordered destruction of the "merciless
Indian savages" of upstate New York, instructing his generals to "chastize" them with "terror." The generals dutifully
carried out these orders. In 1866, General William Tecumseh Sherman ordered "extermination" with vindictive earnestness
of the Sioux. They were virtually exterminated. Secretary of War Elihu Root (1899-1904) under President's McKinley and
Theodore Roosevelt, justified the ruthless U.S. military conduct in the Philippines that savagely killed a half-million
citizens by citing "precedents of the highest authority:" Washington's and Sherman's earlier orders.3
War against nations around the world is not new either. The U.S., over its history, has militarily intervened over 400
times, covertly thousands of times, in over one hundred nations.4 Virtually all these interventions have been lawless.
It has bombed at least eighteen nations since it dropped Atomic bombs on Japan in 1945. It has used chemical warfare
against Southeast Asia, and has provided chemical warfare agents for use by other nations such as Iraq. It has used
biological warfare against China, North Korea, and Cuba. The Koreans are quite aware of most of this history. Most U.S.
Americans are not. But now the U.S. has declared a unilateral terrorist war on the whole world.5
Two of the interventions in the Nineteenth Century were inflicted against Korea, the first in 1866. The second, larger
one, in 1871, witnessed the landing of over 700 marines and sailors on Kanghwa beach on the west side of Korea seeking
to establish the first phases of colonization. Destroying several forts while inflicting over 600 casualties on the
defending Korean natives, the U.S. withdrew realizing that in order to assure hegemonic success, a much larger,
permanent military presence would be necessary. The North Korean people regularly remark about this U.S. invasion, even
though most in South Korea do not know of it due to historic censorship. Most in the U.S. don’t know about it either,
for similar reasons, even though in all of the Nineteenth Century, this was the largest U.S. military force to land on
foreign soil outside of Mexico and Canada until the "Spanish American War" in 1898.
I believe it important for U.S. Americans to place themselves in the position of people living in targeted countries.
That North Korea, a nation of 24 million people, i.e., one-twentieth the population of the U.S., many of them poor, a
land slightly larger in area than the U.S. state of Pennsylvania, continues to be one of the most demonized nations and
least understood, totally perplexes the Korean people. It is worthwhile to seek an understanding of their perspective.
I recently visited that nation and talked with a number of her citizens. I travelled 900 ground miles through six of
North Korea's nine provinces, as well as spending time in Pyongyang, the capital, and several other cities. I talked
with dozens of people from all walks of life. Though times have been hard for North Koreans, especially in the 1990s,
they long ago proudly rebuilt all of their dozens of cities, thousands of villages, and hundreds of dykes and dams
destroyed during the war.
U.S. interference into the sovereign life of Korea immediately upon the 1945 surrender of the hated Japanese, who had
occupied the Korean Peninsula for forty years, is one of the major crimes of the Twentieth Century, from which the
Korean people have never recovered. (SEE "United States Government War Crimes," Spring 2002 - issue # 1 of Global
Outlook). From a North Korean’s perspective they (1) have vigorously opposed the unlawful and egregious division of
their country from day one to the present, (2) were blamed for starting the "Korean War" which in fact had been a
struggle between a minority of wealthy Koreans supporting continued colonization in collaboration with the U.S. and
those majority Koreans who opposed it, (3) proudly and courageously held the U.S. and its "crony U.N. allies" to a
stalemate during the "War," and (4) have been tragically and unfairly considered a hostile nation ever since. They have
not forgotten the forty years of Japanese occupation that preceded the U.S. imposed division and subsequent occupation
that continues in the South. They deeply yearn for reunification of their historically unified culture.
Everyone I talked with, dozens and dozens of folks, lost one if not many more family members during the war, especially
from the continuous bombing, much of it incendiary and napalm, deliberately dropped on virtually every space in the
country. "Every means of communication, every installation, factory, city, and village" was ordered bombed by General
MacArthur in the fall of 1950. It never stopped until the day of the armistice on July 27, 1953. The pained memories of
people are still obvious, and their anger at "America" is often expressed, though they were very welcoming and gracious
to me. Ten million Korean families remain permanently separated from each other due to the military patrolled and fenced
dividing line spanning 150 miles across the entire Peninsula.
Let us make it very clear here for western readers. North Korea was virtually totally destroyed during the "Korean War."
U.S. General Douglas MacArthur's architect for the criminal air campaign was Strategic Air Command head General Curtis
LeMay who had proudly conducted the earlier March 10 - August 15, 1945 continuous incendiary bombings of Japan that had
destroyed 63 major cities and murdered a million citizens. (The deadly Atomic bombings actually killed far fewer
people.) Eight years later, after destroying North Korea's 78 cities and thousands of her villages, and killing
countless numbers of her civilians, LeMay remarked, "Over a period of three years or so we killed off - what - twenty
percent of the population."6 It is now believed that the population north of the imposed 38th Parallel lost nearly a
third its population of 8 - 9 million people during the 37-month long "hot" war, 1950 - 1953, perhaps an unprecedented
percentage of mortality suffered by one nation due to the belligerance of another.
Virtually every person wanted to know what I thought of Bush's recent accusation of North Korea as part of an "axis of
evil." Each of the three governments comprising Bush’s "axis of evil" of course immediately condemned the remarks, North
Korea being no exception. I shared with them my own outrage and fears, and they seemed relieved to know that not all
"Americans" are so cruel and bellicose. As with people in so many other nations with whom the U.S. has treated with
hostility, they simply cannot understand why the U.S. is so obsessed with them.
Koreans were relieved to learn that a recent poll had indicated eighty percent of South Koreans were against the U.S.
belligerant stance against their northern neighbors. The North Korean government described Bush as a "typical rogue and
a kingpin of terrorism" as he was visiting the South in February, only three weeks after presenting his threatening
State of the Union address.7 It was also encouraging that the two Koreas resumed quiet diplomatic talks in March just as
the U.S. and South Korea were once again conducting their regular, large-scale, joint military exercises so enraging to
the North, and to an increasing number of people in the South among the growing reunification movement there.8
In the English-language newspaper, The Pyongyang Times, (February 23, 2002) there were articles entitled "US Is Empire
of the Devil," Korea Will Never Be a Threat to the US," and "Bush’s Remarks Stand Condemned." Quite frankly, all three
of these articles relate a truth about the U.S. that would draw a consensus from many quarters around the world.
While in country, together we listened to Bush's March 14 Voice of America (VOA) radio chastizement of North Korea.
First, he stated that the North's 200,000 prisoner population was proof of terrible repression. Though I had no way of
knowing the number of prisoners in the North, any more than Bush did, I do know that the United States has 2 million
prisoners which is similar in per-capita detention rate to that of North Korea if the 200,000 figure is accurate.
Furthermore, the U.S. has a minimum of 3 million persons, mostly minority and poor, under state supervision of parole
and probation. The U.S. sweeps its class and race problems into prison.
Second, Bush declared that half the population was considered unreliable and, as a result, received less monthly food
rations. The Koreans are a proud people living in a Confucian tradition, having rebuilt their nation from virtual total
destruction during the Korean war. I did not notice any obvious display of dissent. That some Koreans are desperate due
to lack of food, water, and heat, especially in some rural areas, does not necessarily translate into dissent, though
some are seeking relief by travel to neighboring countries.9
Third, Bush claimed that Koreans who listen to foreign radio are targeted for execution. Together we regularly listened
to U.S.VOA radio broadcasts and they freely discussed the content of the broadcasts without fear of reprisals.
Fourth, Bush condemned the DPRK for spending too much on its military, causing food shortages for the people. Note:
Again it must be remembered that it was the U.S. that unilaterally divided Korea following the Japanese surrender in
August 1945, and subsequently ruled with a military occupation government in the south, overseeing the elimination of
virtually the entire popular movement of (majority) opposition to U.S. occupation, murdering hundreds of thousands of
people. The consequent Korean civil war that openly raged in 1948-1950 was completely ignored when the U.S. defined the
beginning of the Korean War in 1950. The U.S. remains at war with the DPRK, never having signed a peace treaty with her.
The war has left a deep scar in the Korean character with a memory that is regularly provoked by continued belligerance
directed at the DPRK. The U.S. regularly holds joint military exercises with South Korean military forces aimed at the
DPRK. The U.S. retains 37,000 military troops at 100 installations south of the 38th parallel. The U.S. has its largest
Asian bombing range where it practices bombs five days a week, fifty-two weeks a year, despite opposition from many
South Koreans. And now Bush has identified North Korea as part of an "axis of evil" targeted for nuclear attack. This is
no remote idea to North Koreans. The U.S. possesses nuclear weapons on ships and planes in the Pacific region
surrounding North Korea. Virtually every nation in this perilous position would be concerned about their defense.
It is worth noting that the United States is the leading military spender in the world resulting in substantial
underfunding of its own indispensable social programs.
Fifth, Bush accused the DPRK of selling weapons to other nations. That is like the pot calling the kettle black. The
U.S. is by far the largest manufacturer of conventional, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons in the world. It is
also the largest seller of these weapons, and has used conventional (against dozens of nations), biological (Cuba,
China, Korea, perhaps others), chemical (Southeast Asia), and nuclear (Japan, and threatened to use them on at least 20
other occasions) weapons. In addition it has armed other nations with these weapons of mass destruction, including Iraq,
one of those countries now identified as part of the "axis of evil." In the year 2000, international arms sales were
nearly $37 billion, with the U.S. being directly responsible for just over half of those sales. South Korea was the
third largest buyer of weapons from the United States with $3.2 worth of military hardware.10 And in January 2002, South
Korea was seriously contemplating purchasing an additional $3.2 billion worth of 40 F-X fighter jets from U.S. arms
giant Boeing.
At the conclusion of this VOA radio broadcast, Koreans and I looked at each other in disbelief. But we also knew that we
were in solidarity with each other as part of the human family. When I said goodbye to my new friends we embraced
knowing that we live in a single world made up of a rich diversity of ideas and species. We know that we are going to
live or die together, and hope that the arrogant and dangerous rhetoric and militarism of the United States will soon
end so we can all live in peace. However, for that to happen, there will need to be a dramatic awakening among the
people and a corresponding expression of massive nonviolent opposition that will make such threatening behavior
impossible to carry out.
Notes
1. Bob Woodward, "CIA Told To Do 'Whatever Necessary' to Kill Bin Laden," The Washington Post, October 21, 2001.
2. Bradley Graham, "Pentagon Plans New Command For U.S. Four Star Officer, Would Over See Homeland Defense," The
Washington Post, January 26, 2002.
3. Richard Drinnon, Facing West: The Metaphysics of Indian Hating and Empire Building. New York: Schocken Books, 1990,
p. 329.
4. B.M. Blechman and S.S. Kaplan, Force Without War: U.S. Armed Forces As A Political Instrument. Wash., D.C.: The
Brookings Institution, 1978, Appendix B; Congressional Research Service (Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division),
Instances of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-1993. Wash., D.C.: Congressional Research Service, 1993; William
Blum, Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Intervention Since World War II. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, 1995; John
Stockwell, The Praetorian Guard. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1991.
5. William Blum, Rogue State. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, 2000; Stephan Endicott and Edward Hagerman, The United
States and Biological Warfare: Secrets From the Early Cold War and Korea. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press,
1998.
6. Richard Rhodes, "The General and World War III," The New Yorker, June 19, 1995, p. 53.
7."North Korea Calls Bush ‘Kingpin of Terrorism," Reuters wire story, February 23, 2002.
8."South Korea Envoy to Travel North," BBC News Online: World: Asia-Pacific, March 25, 2002. Retrieved March 26, 2002,
from http://news.bbc.co.uk/low/english/world/asia-pacific/newsid_1891000/1891457.stm
9. Ji-Yeon Yuh, "North Korean Enemy Should Be Made Friend," The Baltimore Sun, February 27, 2002.
10. Thom Shanker, "Global Arms Sales Rise Again, and the U.S. Leads the Pack, " The New York Times, August 20, 2001.
*************
S. Brian Willlson is a Vietnam veteran, long-time peace activist, and writer. He has visited a number of countries
studying the impacts of U.S. policy. His essays are posted on his website, www.brianwillson.com. He published a small
autobiography, On Third World Legs (Charles Kerr, 1992), which describes his ordeal of having been intentionally run
over by a U.S. Government munitions train accelerating to over three times the 5 mph legal speed limit during a peaceful
protest in California in 1987. He now walks on two prostheses after losing each leg below the knee. Brian Willson
possesses two honorary Ph.D.s and a Juris Doctor degree.
Copyright © B. Willson 2002.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global
Research articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address to the original CRG article
must be indicated. The author's copyright note must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print
or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com
For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com
© Copyright Brian S. Willson, GlobalResearch.ca, 2006
The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle=WIL20061012=3464