US vs. Iran (II) - Hybrid War
VIEW COMPLETE ARTICLE IN PDF FORMAT:
“War is not merely a political act, but also a real political instrument, a continuation of political commerce, a
carrying out of the same by other means. All beyond this which is strictly peculiar to War relates merely to the
peculiar nature of the means which it uses. That the tendencies and views of policy shall not be incompatible with these
means, the Art of War in general and the Commander in each particular case may demand, and this claim is truly not a
trifling one. But however powerfully this may react on political views in particular cases, still it must always be
regarded as only a modification of them; for the political view is the object, War is the means, and the means must
always include the object in our conception.”
- (Carl Von Clausewitz 1780-1831)
American Heritage Dictionary defines politics as “the art or science of government or governing, especially the
governing of a political entity”. But in reality politics is about social relations involving authority and power. We
would like to think that we live in a civilised world where it is the moral principles and ethics rather than physical
power that governs the conduct of the nations. But unfortunately, in our Darwinian world, there is no place for logical,
moral or ethical arguments.
For instance there have been many times in the past, (and even recently) when people such as president Bush, Pentagon
officials and commentators, have argued for the use of tactical nuclear bombs against Iran to prevent it from developing
(may be) similar ( and smaller) weapons in the “future”. Here is an example of these kinds of arguments by people like
Mr. Coren of Toronto Sun (September 2006).
“It is surely obvious now to anybody with even a basic understanding of history, politics and the nature of fascism that
something revolutionary has to be done within months -- if not weeks -- if we are to preserve world peace.
Put boldly and simply, we have to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.
Not, of course, the unleashing of full-scale thermo-nuclear war on the Persian people, but a limited and tactical use of
nuclear weapons to destroy Iran's military facilities and its potential nuclear arsenal. It is, sadly, the only response
that this repugnant and acutely dangerous political entity will understand.”[1]
[1] Toronto Sun, “We should nuke Iran”, September 2, 2006
VIEW COMPLETE ARTICLE IN PDF FORMAT:
ENDS