Distribution via the Unanswered Questions Wire
UQ WIRE LINK:
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
Allegations Brought to Inspectors General
By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 2, 2006; Page A03
See Full Story…
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted
to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather
than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in
summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several
commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough
probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress
and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.
.snip…
"We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H.
Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. "It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's
one of those loose ends that never got tied."
.. snip…
A Pentagon spokesman said yesterday that the inspector general's office will soon release a report addressing whether
testimony delivered to the commission was "knowingly false." A separate report, delivered secretly to Congress in May
2005, blamed inaccuracies in part on problems with the way the Defense Department kept its records, according to a
summary released yesterday.
A spokesman for the Transportation Department's inspector general's office said its investigation is complete and that a
final report is being drafted. Laura Brown, a spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration, said she could not
comment on the inspector general's inquiry.
In an article scheduled to be on newsstands today, Vanity Fair magazine reports aspects of the commission debate --
though it does not mention the possible criminal referrals -- and publishes lengthy excerpts from military audiotapes
recorded on Sept. 11. ABC News aired excerpts last night.
.. snip…
See Full Story…
********************
STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above
article. We present this in the interests of research -for the relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that
the reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping to build bridges between our various
investigative communities, towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions which now lie before us.