The Anti-Empire Report
Some Things You Need To Know Before The World Ends
April 22, 2006
by William Blum
Your War Channel-all war-all the time-24/7-25/8-round the clock-breaking only for commercials for Halliburton and
Bechtel
The recent paper by two prominent academics, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, on "The Israel Lobby", has spurred
considerable discussion both in the mainstream media and on the Internet about the significance of the role played by
this lobby in instigating the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. The answer to this question may reside ultimately, and
solely, in the minds of the neo-conservatives, in or close to official government positions, who lobbied for years to
invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein; an early instance of this being their now-famous letter to President Clinton
in January 1998, which, in no uncertain terms, called for an American strategy that "should aim, above all, at the
removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power". Warning of Saddam's potential for acquiring weapons of mass destruction,
the neo-cons, in language at times sounding frenzied, insisted that his removal was absolutely vital to "the security of
the world in the first part of the 21st century" and for "the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends
and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world's supply of oil."
This of course was a gross exaggeration. In 1998, after seven years of relentless US bombing and draconian sanctions,
Iraq was but a pitiful shell of its former self and no longer a threat even to its neighbors, much less "the world".
There were those who hated Saddam, but the only country that had any good reason to fear Iraq, then or later, was
Israel, as retaliation for Israel's unprovoked bombing of Iraq in 1981. The letter to Clinton was signed by Elliott
Abrams, Richard L. Armitage, William J. Bennett, Jeffrey Bergner, John Bolton, Paula Dobriansky, Francis Fukuyama,
Robert Kagan, Zalmay Khalilzad, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Peter W. Rodman, Donald Rumsfeld, William Schneider,
Jr., Vin Weber, Paul Wolfowitz, R. James Woolsey, and Robert B. Zoellick[1], most of whom, if not all, could be categorized as allies of Israel; most of whom were soon to join the Busheviks. What
could have prompted these individuals to write such a letter to the president other than a desire to eliminate a threat
to the safety of Israel? And when they came into power some began immediately to campaign for regime change in Iraq.
There are those who argue that the United States has invaded numerous countries without requiring instigation by Israel.
This is of course true, it's what the empire does for a living. But to say that the Israel lobby played a vital role in
the invasion of Iraq in 2003 is not to suggest an explanation for the whole history of US foreign interventions.
To the role of the Israel lobby we must add two other factors carrying unknown degrees of weight in the decision to
invade Iraq: controlling vast amounts of oil, and saving the dollar from the euro by reversing Saddam Hussein's decision
to use the latter in Iraq's oil transactions (and this reversal was one of the first edicts of the occupation).
Whatever ambiguity may remain about the role of the Israel lobby in the invasion of Iraq, it's clear that if and when
the sociopaths who call themselves our leaders attack Iran, Israeli security will be the main reason, with the euro in
second place because Iran has been taking -- or at least threatening to take -- serious steps to replace the dollar with
the euro in oil transactions. Iran of course also has lots of oil, but unless the United States aims at conquest and
occupation of the country -- and where will Los Socios find a few hundred thousand more clueless American bodies --
access to and control of the oil would not be very feasible. The Israel lobby appears to be the only major organized
force that is actively pushing the United States toward crisis in Iran. Along with the lobby's leading member, the
American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), there's the American Jewish Committee (AJC), which has taken out
full-page ads in major US newspapers with the less-than-subtle heading: "A Nuclear Iran Threatens All", depicting
radiating circles on an Iran-centered map to show where its missiles could strike.
"The threat from Iran is, of course, their stated objective to destroy our strong ally Israel," declared George W. last
month. "That's a threat, a serious threat. It's a threat to world peace. I made it clear, and I'll make it clear again,
that we will use military might to protect our ally Israel."[2]
Chutzpah of an imperial size
Do you remember the classic example of "chutzpah"? It's the young man who kills his parents and then asks the court for
mercy on the grounds that he's an orphan.
The Bush administration's updated version of that is starting a wholly illegal, immoral, and devastating war and then
dismissing all kinds of criticism of its action on the grounds that "We're at war."
They use this excuse to defend warrantless spying, to defend the imprisonment of people for years without charging them
with a crime, to abuse and torture them, to ignore the Geneva Convention and other international treaties; they use it
against Democrats, accusing them of partisanship during "a time of war"; they use it to justify the expansion of
presidential powers and the weakening of checks and balances. In short, they claim "We can do whatever we want about
anything at all related to this war, because we're at war."
"War is war," says Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, "and it has never been the case that when you captured a
combatant you have to give them a jury trial in your civil courts. Give me a break."[3] Scalia, in his public talks, implies that prisoners held in the far-flung American gulag were all "captured on the
battlefield".[4] But this is simply false. Very few of the poor souls were captured on any kind of battlefield, few had even a gun in
their hand; most were just in the wrong place at the wrong time or were turned in by an informer for an American bounty
or a personal grudge.
The American public, like all publics, requires only sufficient repetition from "respectable" sources to learn how to
play the game: Earlier this month many cities of Wisconsin held referendums on bringing the troops home from Iraq.
Here's Jim Martin, 48, a handyman in Evansville. He thinks that his city shouldn't waste taxpayers' money running a
referendum that means nothing. "The fact of the matter remains, we're at war," he said as he ate his lunch at the Night
Owl bar.[5]
And here now is Chris Simcox a leader in the Minuteman movement that patrols the Mexican border: "If I catch you
breaking into my country in the middle of the night and we're at war ... you're a potential enemy. I don't care if
you're a busboy coming to wash dishes."[6]
One observer has summed up the legal arguments put forth by the Bush administration thusly: "The existing laws do not
apply because this is a different kind of war. It's a different kind of war because the president says so. The president
gets to say so because he is president. ... We follow the laws of war except to the extent that they do not apply to us.
These prisoners have all the rights to which they are entitled by law, except to the extent that we have changed the law
to limit their rights."[7]
Yet, George W. has cut taxes tremendously, something probably unprecedented while at war.
Facing calls for impeachment, plummeting popularity, a looming Republican electoral disaster, and massive failure in
Mesopotamia, Georgie looks toward Persia. He and the other gang members will be able to get away with almost anything
they can think of if they can say "We're in two wars!"
A tale of two terrorists
Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person charged to date in the United States in connection with the September 11, 2001
attacks, testifying at his trial in Alexandria, Virginia:
The sobbing September 11 survivors and family members who testified against him were "disgusting" ... He and other
Muslims want to "exterminate" American Jews ... executed Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was "the greatest
American"[8] He expressed his willingness to kill Americans "any time, anywhere" ... "I wish it had happened not only on the 11th,
but the 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th."[9]
Orlando Bosch, one of the masterminds behind the October 6, 1976 bombing of a Cuban passenger plane, blown out of the
sky with 73 people on board, including the entire young Cuban fencing team, interviewed April 8 by Juan Manuel Cao of
Channel 41 in Miami:
Cao: Did you down that plane in 1976?
Bosch: If I tell you that I was involved, I will be inculpating myself ... and if I tell you that I did not participate
in that action, you would say that I am lying. I am therefore not going to answer one thing or the other.
Cao: In that action 73 persons were killed ...
Bosch: No chico, in a war such as us Cubans who love liberty wage against the tyrant [Fidel Castro], you have to down
planes, you have to sink ships, you have to be prepared to attack anything that is within your reach.
Cao: But don't you feel a little bit for those who were killed there, for their families?
Bosch: Who was on board that plane? Four members of the Communist Party, five north Koreans, five Guyanese ... Who was
there? Our enemies.
Cao: And the fencers? The young people on board?
Bosch: I saw the young girls on television. There were six of them. After the end of the competition, the leader of
the six dedicated their triumph to the tyrant. She gave a speech filled with praise for the tyrant. We had already
agreed in Santo Domingo, that everyone who comes from Cuba to glorify the tyrant had to run the same risks as those men
and women that fight alongside the tyranny.
Cao: If you ran into the family members who were killed in that plane, wouldn't you think it difficult ... ?
Bosch: No, because in the end those who were there had to know that they were cooperating with the tyranny in Cuba.
The main difference between Zacarias Moussaoui and Orlando Bosch is that one of them is on trial for his life while the
other walks around Miami a free man, free enough to be interviewed on television.
Bosch had a partner in plotting the bombing of the Cuban airliner, Luis Posada, a Cuban-born citizen of Venezuela. He's
being held in custody in the United States on a minor immigration charge. His extradition has been requested by
Venezuela for several crimes including the downing of the airliner, part of the plotting having taken place in
Venezuela. But the Bush administration refuses to send him to Venezuela because they don't like the Venezuelan
government, nor will they try him in the United States for the crime. However, the Convention for the Suppression of
Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Civil Aviation (1973), of which the United States is a signatory, gives Washington
no discretion. Article 7 says that the state in which "the alleged offender is found shall, if it does not extradite
him, be obliged, without exception whatsoever and whether or not the offence was committed in its territory, to submit
the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution."[10] Extradite or prosecute. The United States does neither.
This is your mind on anti-communism
Earlier this month, in Miami-Dade County, Florida (where else?) it was reported that the parent of a schoolchild asked
the school board to ban a book called "Vamos a Cuba" ("Let's go to Cuba"), a travel book that has smiling kids on the
cover and inside depicts happy scenes from a festival held in Cuba. "As a former political prisoner from Cuba, I find
the material to be untruthful," Juan Amador, wrote to the school board. "It portrays a life in Cuba that does not exist.
I believe it aims to create an illusion and distort reality." Mr. Amador is presumably claiming that no one in Cuba is
ever happy or even smiles. The book is currently being reviewed by a school committee.[11]
During his recent election campaign, Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi declared that communists in Mao's China boiled
babies to make fertilizer.[12] He defended his remark by citing: "The Black Book of Communism", a "history" of communism published in 1997, a book
that is to the study of communism as "The Protocols of the Elders of Zionism" is to Judaism or the collected statements
of George W. Bush are to understanding why we are fighting in Iraq. Berlusconi's remark may actually be regarded as
progress in the wonderful world of anti-communism, for following the Russian Revolution of 1917 it was widely and long
proclaimed that the Bolsheviks killed and ate babies (as the early pagans believed the Christians guilty of devouring
their children; the same was believed of Jews in the Middle Ages). It's interesting to note (Well, to me at least) that
in 2003, when my book Killing Hope was published in Italy, the publisher gave it the title "Il Libro Nero Degli Stati
Uniti" ("The Black Book of The United States").[13]
Charles Taylor and that fake opposition party known as the Democrats
Some things I have to repeat, because the news makes them relevant once again, and because the media ignores them once
again. Charles Taylor, former president of Liberia, has been captured and is being held for trial in a UN-sponsored
war-crimes court in neighboring Sierra Leone. In 2003 Taylor was indicted by this court for "bearing the greatest
responsibility for war crimes, crimes against humanity and serious violations of international humanitarian law" during
Sierra Leone's civil war. The United States, along with the rest of the world, condemns Taylor, applauds his capture,
and calls for his punishment. What we're not reminded of is this:
In 1998, President Clinton sent Rev. Jesse Jackson as his special envoy to Liberia and Sierra Leone, the latter being in
the midst of one of the great horrors of the 20th century -- You may remember the army of mostly young boys, the
Revolutionary United Front (RUF), who went around raping and chopping off people's arms and legs. African and world
opinion was enraged against the RUF, which was committed to protecting the diamond mines they controlled. Taylor was an
indispensable ally and supporter of the RUF and Jackson was an old friend of his. Jesse was not sent to the region to
try to curtail the RUF's atrocities, nor to hound Taylor about his widespread human rights violations, but instead, in
June 1999, Jackson and other American officials drafted entire sections of an accord that made RUF leader, Foday Sankoh,
Sierra Leone's vice president, and gave him official control over the diamond mines, the country's major source of
wealth.[14]
And what was the Clinton administration's interest in all this? It's been speculated that the answer lies with certain
individuals with ties to the diamond industry and to Clinton, while he was president or while governor of Arkansas; for
example, Maurice Tempelsman, generous contributor to the Democratic Party and escort of Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright around this time, whose Antwerp, Amsterdam and Tel Aviv diamond marts arranged for Sierra Leone diamond sales
to Tiffany and Cartier.[15]
Good ol' Bill? Good ol' Jess? I know, I know, I keep tearing down your heroes. Who will you have left? But remember the
words of the two characters in Bertolt Brecht's "Galileo":
"Unhappy the land that has no heroes," says the first.
"No," says the other, "Unhappy the land that needs heroes."
Or as Abbie Hoffman said: "Sacred cows make the best hamburger."
After the war-crimes trial we'll need a second tribunal for shameless lying, gross insults to our intelligence, and
just plain weird stupidity and stupid weirdness.
George W. Bush, speaking March 29, 2006 to the Freedom House organization in Washington: "We're a country of deep
compassion. We care. One of the great things about America, one of the beauties of our country, is that when we see a
young, innocent child blown up by an IED [improvised explosive device], we cry. We don't care what the child's religion
may be, or where that child may live, we cry. It upsets us. The enemy knows that, and they're willing to -- they're
willing to kill to shake our confidence. That's what they're trying to do."[16]
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Is this any way to organize a society of human beings?
April 18 was the 100th anniversary of the historic, catastrophic San Francisco earthquake of 1906. Studies predict that
the next big quake in the city will take a much greater human toll because so many of the residents live in apartments
and houses built before building codes were tightened in 1970. And because many units are rent-controlled apartments, we
are told, landlords have few incentives to seismic retrofit.[17] There are those who would use this as an argument against rent control. There are others who would use it as an
argument against free enterprise or private ownership of housing. Think of it. Over the years, California has learned
very well how to modernize buildings to prepare them to withstand earthquakes much better than in the past. That this
works has been proven again and again, even dramatically, such as in Los Angeles, hit by a 7.4 quake in 1994, with
relatively little damage. (I was asleep in my bed in Hollywood when it hit in the early morning of January 17 and was
rudely and frighteningly awakened, but the apartment building was fine.) Yet large numbers of people in California are
still living in dwellings very vulnerable to a quake because to correct the situation would adversely affect the profit
and loss statements of the owners of those dwellings.
NOTES
(1) Letter to Clinton: http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm
(2) Agence France Presse, March 20, 2006
(3) Newsweek, April 3, 2006
(4) Washington Post, April 15, 2006, p.2
(5) Associated Press, March 27, 2006
(6) Philadelphia Inquirer, March 26, 2006
(7) Dahlia Lithwick, Slate.com, March 28, 2006
(8) Washington Post, April 14, 2006, p.1
(9) Deutsche Presse-Agentur, April 13, 2006
(10) www.unodc.org/unodc/terrorism_convention_civil_aviation.html
(11) Washington Post, April 9, 2006, p.2
(12) Associated Press, March 29, 2006
(13) For many other examples of the mind on anti-communism, see William Blum, "Freeing the World to Death", chapter 12
("Before there were terrorists there were communists and the wonderful world of anti-communism")
(14) Ryan Lizza, "Where angels fear to tread", New Republic, July 24, 2000
(15) The Washington Post, August 2, 1997, p.A1 and February 6, 1998, p.B1 re Tempelsman. Other speculation in various
places has concerned diamond investors Jean Raymond Boulle and Robert Friedland, each with alleged ties to Clinton.
(16) Federal Information and News Dispatch, Inc., State Department Documents and Publications, March 29, 2006
(17) Washington Post, April 17, 2006, p.3
*************
William Blum is the author of:
Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War 2
Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower
West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir
Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire
Previous Anti-Empire Reports can be read at this website.
Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission. I'd appreciate it if the website were mentioned.