Meditations - From Martin LeFevre
in California Positive Thinking is Negative Acting
A local reader wrote to say that she felt my last column
, and my writing generally, was quite “dark.” She stated that “our minds will be dark when we think darkly,” and went on
to echo one of the most pernicious philosophies America has ever dished out to the world—“the power of positive
The main progenitor of the theory of positive thinking, which has become an almost unassailable prescription for the
ills of society, family, and the individual, was a preacher named Norman Vincent Peale. Born near the end of the 19th
century and dying near the end of the 20th, Peale was a cleric for over 50 years in New York. He wrote the puddle-deep
tract, famously (or infamously) entitled, “The Power of Positive Thinking.”
Peale is mentioned as a “deep philosopher” in Tom Lehrer’s 1959 song, “It makes a fellow proud to be a soldier.” Lehrer
was mining a rich vein of satire, which, in present-day America’s “support our soldiers” climate, even comedian Jon
Stewart wouldn’t dig.
Positive thinking amounts to taking a ‘see no evil hear no evil’ attitude. It converts the proverb, “as one thinks in
one’s heart, so one is,” cutting out the heart and turning it into the diktat, ‘as I think in my head, so…my biz.’
From a phenomenological point of view, it’s fascinating how positive thinking has provided the soil for the darkest
impulses in American society to grow. The culmination and chief exponent of this homegrown American philosophy is George
W. Bush. Indeed, the Bush White House is conducting an unwitting experiment to see just how long obstinate optimism,
coupled with expert marketing and media complicity, can hold sway over reality.
Take the “war of choice” in Iraq. Its very conception was a triumph of pigheaded belief over historical awareness. When
the war predictably degenerated into a bedlam of body parts, the White House, pursuing the logical end of positive
thinking, began repeating ad nauseam how progress was being made. And why not, since one of the tenets of positive
thinking is that when you believe what you want to believe strongly enough, and reiterate it often enough, your fantasy
will become reality.
Nonetheless, positive thinking does not diminish individual and collective darkness, but instead allows all manner of
evils to increase. Indeed, positive thinking is how North American culture became saturated with darkness.
Collective darkness can only act through a person as long as one acts out of hidden regions that one refuses to own.
Therefore willfully staying on the sunny side of life in a culture drenched in collective darkness insures that one
becomes a conduit.
Of course, this is no longer an American problem. The Internet has become a great cover and playground for countless
weak and faceless conduits. Such people don’t realize, however, that they are exposing themselves, and weakening the
source of their power, every time they act out of darkness.
To see human nature as essentially good, as New Agers do, is merely the flip side of seeing human nature as essentially
evil, as conservative Christians do. The former mindset willfully ignores darkness, and thereby allows it to grow. The
latter mind-set personifies darkness and projects evil outside, becoming self-fulfilling in its creation of enemies.
Thus the “war on terror” is producing many more terrorists.
Just what does this rather abstract term ‘darkness’ refer to? Darkness, as I see it, is the toxic byproduct of
innumerable generations of non-self-knowing people, generating a growing subconscious substratum of fear, hate, and
self-centered activity in collective consciousness.
What then are ‘conduits?’ When people refuse to take total responsibility for the darkness within them, they become
pipelines for collective darkness. That is especially true when a society becomes saturated with darkness. It’s true
—the only thing evil requires to prevail is for decent men and women to look the other way.
A saying attributed to Jesus goes: "Bring forth what is within you, and what you bring forth will save you; do not bring
forth what is within you, and what you do not bring forth will destroy you."
So what is positive and what is negative –to deny or ignore the darkness within and around one, or face it, and tell
things as they are?
- Martin LeFevre is a contemplative, and non-academic religious and political philosopher. He has been publishing in
North America, Latin America, Africa, and Europe (and now New Zealand) for 20 years. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
. The author welcomes comments.