The Silent Scream Of Numbers
The 2004 election was stolen — will someone please tell the media?
By Robert C. Koehler
Tribune Media Services
As they slowly hack democracy to death, we’re as alone — we citizens — as we’ve ever been, protected only by the
dust-covered clichés of the nation’s founding: “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”
It’s time to blow off the dust and start paying the price.
The media are not on our side. The politicians are not on our side. It’s just us, connecting the dots, fitting the
fragments together, crunching the numbers, wanting to know why there were so many irregularities in the last election
and why these glitches and dirty tricks and wacko numbers had not just an anti-Kerry but a racist tinge. This is not
about partisan politics. It’s more like: “Oh no, this can’t be true.”
I just got back from what was officially called the National Election Reform Conference, in Nashville, Tenn., an
extraordinary pulling together of disparate voting-rights activists — 30 states were represented, 15 red and 15 blue —
sponsored by a Nashville group called Gathering To Save Our Democracy. It had the feel of 1775: citizen patriots taking
matters into their own hands to reclaim the republic. This was the level of its urgency.
Was the election of 2004 stolen? Thus is the question framed by those who don’t want to know the answer. Anyone who says
yes is immediately a conspiracy nut, and the listener’s eyeballs roll. So let’s not ask that question.
Let’s simply ask why the lines were so long and the voting machines so few in Columbus and Cleveland and inner-city and
college precincts across the country, especially in the swing states, causing an estimated one-third of the voters in
these precincts to drop out of line without casting a ballot; why so many otherwise Democratic ballots, thousands and
thousands in Ohio alone, but by no means only in Ohio, recorded no vote for president (as though people with no opinion
on the presidential race waited in line for three or six or eight hours out of a fervor to have their say in the race
for county commissioner); and why virtually every voter complaint about electronic voting machine malfunction indicated
an unauthorized vote switch from Kerry to Bush.
This, mind you, is just for starters. We might also ask why so many Ph.D.-level mathematicians and computer programmers
and other numbers-savvy scientists are saying that the numbers don’t make sense (see, for instance, www.northnet.org/minstrel
, the Web site of Dr. Richard Hayes Phillips, lead statistician in the Moss v. Bush lawsuit challenging the Ohio
election results). Indeed, the movement to investigate the 2004 election is led by such people, because the numbers are
screaming at them that something is wrong.
And we might, no, we must, ask — with more seriousness than the media have asked — about those exit polls, which in
years past were extraordinarily accurate but last November went haywire, predicting Kerry by roughly the margin by which
he ultimately lost to Bush. This swing is out of the realm of random chance, forcing chagrined pollsters to hypothesize
a “shy Republican” factor as the explanation; and the media have bought this evidence-free absurdity because it spares
them the need to think about the F-word: fraud.
And the numbers are still haywire. A few days ago, Terry Neal wrote in the Washington Post about Bush’s inexplicably low
approval rating in the latest Gallup poll, 45 percent, vs. a 49 percent disapproval rating. This is, by a huge margin,
the worst rating at this point in a president’s second term ever recorded by Gallup, dating back to Truman.
“What’s wrong with this picture?” asks exit polling expert Jonathan Simon, who pointed these latest numbers out to me.
Bush mustered low approval ratings immediately before the election, surged on Election Day, then saw his ratings plunge
immediately afterward. Yet Big Media has no curiosity about this anomaly.
Simon, who spoke at the Nashville conference — one of dozens of speakers to give highly detailed testimony on evidence
of fraud and dirty tricks from sea to shining sea — said, “When the autopsy of our democracy is performed, it is my
belief that media silence will be given as the primary cause of death.”
In contrast to the deathly silence of the media is the silent scream of the numbers. The more you ponder these numbers,
and all the accompanying data, the louder that scream grows. Did the people’s choice get thwarted? Were thousands
disenfranchised by chaos in the precincts, spurious challenges and uncounted provisional ballots? Were millions
disenfranchised by electronic voting fraud on insecure, easily hacked computers? And who is authorized to act if this is
so? Who is authorized to care?
No one, apparently, except average Americans, who want to be able to trust the voting process again, and who want their
"Our world faces a crisis as yet unperceived by those possessing the power to make great decisions for good and evil.
The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking, and thus we drift toward unparalleled
— Albert Einstein