Moral Clarity On These Issues
By Angie Pratt
You can not be a Christian and support torture of any kind in any circumstance.
You can not be a Christian and support treatment of "enemy war combatants" in any way other than the way in which
Jeffery Dalmer or Ted Bundy were treated. You can not be a Christian and support the detaining of ghost prisoners
without legal recourse under the presumption of guilt – in the absence of evidence. You can not be a Christian and
ignore the fact that the practice of rendition, a euphemism for torture by proxy, demonstrates malice aforethought.
Moral clarity on these issues is not debatable.
The country's religious leaders have an obligation to their churches, to their parishioners and to themselves to stand
up and clearly state their positions on this subject. Silence relays tacit approval. Not speaking out makes us all
accessories to the fact.
Some churches have indeed stood up and found their voices. The Church of Christ is categorically against all forms of
torture and the practice of rendition. The United Methodist Church has been outspoken in their believe that America's
current policies on the treatment of terrorist prisoners are immoral. The National Council of Churches has issued
multiple formal press releases denouncing the "chaos and treatment of prisoners in Iraq".
Where are the formal statements from the religious right on these matters? Where is Pat Robertson's moral indignation on
Alberto Gonzales' memos? The fact of the matter is that Pat Robertson has come out in support of the Bush
Administrations’ policies on the treatment of prisoners and the nomination of Alberto Gonzales.
Where does James Dobson stand on this matter? James Dobson, whose "Focus on the Family" broadcast is heard by 2 million
U.S. listeners each day, hasn't come out against torture. Instead he makes statements suggesting that it isn't an issue.
Perhaps this is why Adam Kotsko, a Christian writer, has likened him to a fascist.
Why haven't we heard anything from Billy Graham? The man who is credited with turning around the life of George W. Bush
surely has influence. The man who for decades now has accepted donations from Christians from around the world surely
knows that torture is never acceptable.
Could it be that these moral leaders of the religious right have decided that their secular political loyalty is greater
than their love of Christ? Is it possible that these men of God are ignoring the teaching of Jesus because they have
embraced the idea that their religious ends justify secular means? Selective promotion of morals isn’t good enough.
Government, military and religious leaders must be held accountable. A blind eye can not be turned to the fact that
words and actions do not match. Accepting a denial with a wink and a nod makes us all as guilty as the perpetrators. The
ends do not justify the means. As we all know, good intentions pave the road to hell.
If, as Jesus said, a rich man would have an easier time getting through the eye of the needle than into heaven then
surely it would be easier for a rich man to get into to heaven than anyone who has supported torture with word, deed or
silence.
Written by Angie Pratt ( http://www.politicalposts.com). Please run as a Letter to the Editor, guest editorial or PoliticalPosts column.