Distribution via the Unanswered Questions Wire
Sign up for the wire at:
Unanswered Questions : Thinking for ourselves.
Tin Soldiers and We are Coming
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Wednesday 26 May 2004
***********
George W. Bush is running for a second term on the basis of his performance in the defense of our national security.
Vice President Cheney has flatly stated that if Bush loses in 2004, the terrorists win. In truth, however, the national
security of the United States of America has been raped by these people. 'Rape' is a strong word, but in truth, is not
strong enough to describe what has taken place. This disaster can be summed up in one name: Ahmad Chalabi.
Chalabi was the head of the Iraqi National Congress, a dissident group organized for the purpose of overthrowing the
regime of Saddam Hussein. Chalabi was a beloved ally of Don Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney before they came to power with this
administration; Chalabi and his group were the impetus behind the passage of the Iraqi Liberation Act in 1998,
legislation advocated loudly by Rumsfeld, Cheney and the neo-conservatives who now occupy this government.
Rumsfeld personally groomed Chalabi to take control of Iraq once Hussein was removed. This, despite the fact that
Chalabi was convicted of 32 counts of bank fraud in Jordan and sentenced in absentia to 22 years in prison, despite the
fact that Chalabi had not set foot in Iraq since he was a teenager, despite the fact that he had no power base and no
credibility in the Middle East. Because the neo-cons loved him, however, Chalabi saw his opening. More than anything, he
lusted after the oil revenues available from an Iraq he controlled.
Flash forward to January 2001. George W. Bush and his crew took office, and within a week of the inauguration, began
planning for the invasion and occupation of Iraq. These plans were kicked into high gear after the attacks of September
11. Bush, grudgingly, agreed to attack Afghanistan and dismantle that Taliban and al Qaeda stronghold. Iraq, however,
was large in the minds of Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and the other architects of our current condition. By
September of 2002, Afghanistan was left aside - another failed 'Mission Accomplished' - and Iraq was the new focus.
The attacks of September 11 made Ahmad Chalabi. The Bush administration had already decided to attack Iraq, and then
began casting about for evidence to support the decision which had already been made. Don Rumsfeld organized a secretive
group within the Defense Department called the Office of Special Plans, the purpose of which was to cherry-pick
intelligence reports that made Iraq appear to be an imminent threat. Representatives of the OSP - including Vice
President Cheney, Cheney deputy Lewis "Scooter" Libby, and former Speaker Newt Gingrich - visited CIA headquarters on
several occasions to browbeat the analysts into "toughening up" their analyses of the Iraqi threat.
More than any single person, Ahmad Chalabi was the source for the 'intelligence' on the Iraqi threat that was offered to
the American people. Chalabi was the man who claimed Iraq was in possession of vast stockpiles of weapons of mass
destruction. He was able to broadband this lie by becoming the trusted source for New York Times journalist Judith
Miller. Miller wrote article after article about the WMD threat posed by Iraq, based on the false data provided by
Chalabi. The rest of the news media piggy-backed on the reputation of the Times and re-reported Miller's WMD information
across the news spectrum, turning Chalabi's false data into axiomatic truth in the eyes of the American public. It was a
masterful stroke.
Chalabi was the man who claimed Hussein enjoyed deep operational connections with Osama bin Laden and the al Qaeda
terror network. This allegation, along with the claims of weapons of mass destruction, created the 'imminent threat'
aura which greased the skids towards invasion. Like the WMD claims, no proof of the al Qaeda allegations could be
established.
Finally, Chalabi was the man who told Rumsfeld and the rest of the crew that an invasion and occupation of Iraq would be
a cakewalk, that the people of Iraq would welcome us with flowers and joy. 802 dead American soldiers later, thousands
of wounded American soldiers later, at least ten thousand dead Iraqis later, uncounted billions of dollars later, we
have come to see exactly how wrong this claim was. Bush, Rumsfeld and the rest believed him implicitly in every aspect,
because he was telling them what they wanted to hear.
Rumsfeld, the OSP and the neo-cons in general did not have much use throughout all this for the American intelligence
community. The CIA, for one, refused to deliver the clear-cut evidence of an Iraqi threat needed to justify the
already-made decision to invade. Because Rumsfeld and the rest had Chalabi in hand, they happily cut the CIA and the
rest of the American intelligence community completely out of the loop. This actually became funny last summer, when the
Bush administration went out of its way to blame the CIA for the fact that no weapons of mass destruction or al Qaeda
connections could be found in Iraq.
Now, we come to discover that Chalabi, beloved by the Bush administration, was in fact serving the national security
interests of Iran. For the record, Iran does have operational relationships with international terrorism, and does have
a robust program for the development of weapons of mass destruction.
The CIA is in possession today of "rock-solid" evidence that Ahmad Chalabi is an agent of the Iranian government, that
he used his position with the Bush administration to push false data upon the gullible hawks in Washington. According to
a report by Julian Borger in the UK Guardian, "The CIA has hard evidence that Mr. Chalabi and his intelligence chief,
Aras Karim Habib, passed US secrets to Tehran, and that Mr Habib has been a paid Iranian agent for several years,
involved in passing intelligence in both directions."
"The implications," writes Borger, "are far-reaching. Mr. Chalabi and Mr. Habib were the channels for much of the
intelligence on Iraqi weapons on which Washington built its case for war. 'It's pretty clear that Iranians had us for
breakfast, lunch and dinner,' said an intelligence source in Washington yesterday. 'Iranian intelligence has been
manipulating the US for several years through Chalabi.' Larry Johnson, a former senior counter-terrorist official at the
state department, said: 'When the story ultimately comes out we'll see that Iran has run one of the most masterful
intelligence operations in history. They persuaded the US and Britain to dispose of its greatest enemy.'"
Iran's motives are crystal clear. Iraq has been a mortal enemy of Iran for decades. The process engineered by Chalabi
has destroyed that enemy, and opened the way to a Shia-controlled Iraq that would be a natural ally of Shia-controlled
Iran. In the process, Iran has come into possession of national security secrets so important that only a select few
American officials were cleared for them. As a side benefit, Iran has watched the United States flail like a beached
whale in Iraq, squandering billions of dollars and thousands of lives while shattering its reputation around the world.
George W. Bush and his people delivered this boon to Iran on a silver platter. Let us recap:
1. The Bush administration, enamored of Chalabi, threw the American intelligence services under the bus, leaving us
blind, deaf and dumb;
2. The Bush administration barnstormed us into a catastrophic war in Iraq on the word of Chalabi, giving Osama bin
Laden the kind of rallying point he had previously only fantasized about;
3. Because the Bush administration trusted Chalabi so completely, he was able to give our national security secrets
to Iran, while simultaneously feeding Bush's people disinformation about Iraq, which they were all too ready to hear and
act upon;
4. Because Chalabi was working for Iran, and because he has coughed up the deep national security secrets he gained
via access provided by the Bush administration, there are more than 130,000 American soldiers in Iraq whose lives are in
far greater danger than anyone previously imagined;
5. The Bush administration paid Chalabi $340,000 a month to do this, over and above whatever he earned from Iranian
intelligence for selling us down the river.
The damage all this has done is incalculable.
The hawks will try to put all the blame for this on Ahmad Chalabi alone, and will claim they were "duped." The truth,
however, is that Bush's people have been courting Chalabi for years, long before they became a part of this
administration. He is their creature. The truth is that Bush's people wanted this Iraq war, and were willing to do
whatever was necessary to get it. Chalabi was their vehicle, and in using him, they have betrayed us all.
The truth is that George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and the rest of the neo-conservatives are personally responsible for
the delivery of our most precious national security secrets into the hands of Iran, a nation that has believed itself to
be at war with us since the Carter administration. The method of that delivery, this Iraq invasion and occupation, has
made the entire world a more dangerous place by orders of magnitude. Thousands are dead, and more will certainly die,
because of this.
There is no repackaged 'Five-Point Plan' this administration can offer, no series of campaign speeches, which can
salvage this situation. Bush and his people have lost the 'war,' they have lost the 'peace,' they have disgraced us
throughout the world, and they have dim-witted their way through all of this for the benefit of Iran. This is the most
damaging breach of national security in generations.
'Rape' is a strong word, but is all too appropriate for what has taken place here.
***********
William Rivers Pitt is the senior editor and lead writer for truthout. He is a New York Times and international bestselling author of two
books - 'War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know' and 'The Greatest Sedition is Silence.'
***********
STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above
article. We present this in the interests of research -for the relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that
the reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping to build bridges between our various
investigative communities, towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions which now lie before us.