Scoop welcomes feedback from readers. Please send your feedback to editor@scoop.co.nz
**************
Dear Sir:
The fact that very little has been published about the real conditions on Internet in Cuba, even after a very clarifying
statement by the Cuban Minister of Communications indicates the need for me to request you to shed light on the Cuban
position on this issue after the very negative article covering a statement by Amnesty International published in SCOOP
some days ago.
The very absence of alternative information with the Cuban points of view in your publication or elsewhere in Internet
is a clear indication of the weakness and traps of considering Internet as the ultimate and better medium for free
information among nations.
Although we, Cubans, do not deny the opportunities to use Internet as a tool to convey the message of Cuba in this
globalized and westernized world ruled by corporate media, it is anyway, an uphill battle, because today censorship
comes not by deleting or denying access to information, but through “embedding” it to the tanks of the masters or by
hiding the real news behind a mountain of frivolous propaganda and commercials, mp3s, movies and games.
I cannot but consider the assessment of Amnesty International against freedom of expression in Cuba as totally biased
and full of prejudices according to the values of western and developed countries that do not take into consideration
particular and historical conditions in Third World countries and always try to extrapolate those values naively and
with utter ignorance of historical backgrounds. Being an organization with a long experience I can accept it is naïve,
and therefore immediately the possibility that this NGO is supporting the Bush Administration efforts to demonize Cuba
in order to create the timely momentum for a regime change as they did in Iraq, comes to my mind.
Why when Cuba implement measures to regulate access to Internet and avoid hackers, stealing passwords, access to
pornographic, satanic cult, terrorist or other negative sites it is considered a repression on the freedom of expression
and when other countries do the same thing it is just a process to regulate the Internet use?
Why is AI trying to give the impression that the private access to Internet in Cuba is so high that its better
regulation can constitute an attempt to repress the flow of information?
Is Amnesty International not aware that Cuba is a poor (but with a great dignity) Third World country in which the
typical conditions of connectivity of the first World do not apply?
Is AI considering condemning the western world for not allowing free flow of information to Africa, where less than 1%
of their population has access to Internet? Is AI saying anything to the fact that 90% of the world population does not
have access to Internet and more than 70% of those connected live in developed countries and 75% of the sites are in
English? Is Amnesty International saying anything to the fact that according to the INTERPOL there are more than 17 000
pornographic sites in Internet and most of them are in developed countries?
Why is Amnesty International following the routine path of the anti Cuban mafia in Miami of trying to compare Cuba with
the United States on what we should have and not to the rest of Latin America, our logical historical context?
In Central America, Internet access is a luxury. In Guatemala, 0.6% of the population has access; in El Salvador, the
rate is 0.7%; in Nicaragua, 0.04% and in Honduras, 0.03%. Even in large and populated nations of the Third World, there
are very few citizens with Internet access: in Mexico, 4.6% of the population; in India, 1.6%; in Indonesia, 1.8%.
In a world where Internet access is just for the elite, where billions of people have never seen a telephone set and
have no hopes of ever accessing the Net – because a large portion of them cannot read or write – the possible path to be
followed by underdeveloped countries, and the most democratic and massive, is the one we are travelling down.
Furthermore, Amnesty International forgets at the risk of being considered totally ignorant, on which concrete
conditions Cuba have had to develop its Internet access and connectivity. Why there is no condemnation of the US
Administration of the cost that Cuba has to pay to connect to Internet, and the obstacles they put in order to avoid
that we may have greater width, which will be the necessary condition to have a larger amount of users connected to
Internet?
The US blockade against Cuba seriously hampers our country’s access to new Information and Communication Technologies:
- Since 1962, Cuba has had no access to telecommunications and computer equipment owned by any US company or subsidiary.
- Because of the blockade, the Cuban telecommunications sector has suffered million-dollar losses in basic and wireless
telephone activities, alarm systems, e-commerce and postal communications. In telephone activities alone, losses
amounted to US$ 21.7 million in 2002.
- On 10 April 2003, the US Department of Commerce refused to give an export license to USA/Cuba-INFOMED, a humanitarian
NGO based in California, which intended, as on previous occasions, to donate 423 PCs to Cuban hospitals and polyclinics
to support the diagnosis and medical information network. “This export would be deleterious to the foreign policy
interests of the United States,” it stated.
- When the US Army developed the e-mail, Cuba had no access to that service or to technical know-how or equipment. The
access by the Cubans to US sites on the Internet was blocked until May 1994. Therefore, Cuba could not take part in the
Internet process at an earlier stage.
- It is not up to Cuba to be connected to the Internet at the speed it would like to or with as many independent
channels or providers it can choose. Each time Cuba tries to add a new channel to the Internet, the US counterpart must
procure the appropriate license from the US Treasury Department. Likewise, if an American company wants to open a new
channel for Cuba or decides to upgrade the connection speed, a license must be issued.
- Cuba’s current connection to the so-called Infoband does not offer the appropriate bandwidth to meet the country’s
requirements. The blockade compels Cuba to use an expensive and slow satellite-related bandwidth and connection. The
problem could be solved with the connection of a fiber-optic cable between Cuba and the Florida Straits, but the US has
not allowed so.
Furthermore, Amnesty International completely ignores that Cuba’s electronic space is continuously violated by the US
Government through US government controlled radio stations and that the groups from Miami with the support of the US
Administration continuously try to disrupt the Cuban connection to Internet through spamming the Cuban servers.
Amnesty International knows, because it has mentioned it in other reports with the extraterrestrial and surgical
objectivity of somebody that does not want to aggravate its master that the US Administration has announced a new
Commission to see through the rapid Transition of Cuba, in a disguised title that smells too much to “regime change” and
that the US Government have allocated more than 25 million USD dollars to Internet sites based in Miami to “convey the
truth” to the Cuban people.
Therefore, why Amnesty International may consider that Cuba does not have the right to regulate for the best use of the
Cuban people its access to Internet, while at the same time defending its sovereignty against the imperial power that
very people dare to face these days?
As this reply is already becoming long I would highly appreciate its publication, at which point I would like to have a
second part to be published: What we are doing in Cuba in favour of the Information and Telecommunication Technologies and why everything that
Amnesty International has said does not reflect Cuba’s reality.
Just to conclude for the time being let me quote the Cuban Minister of Communications:
“I can ascertain that there’s no change whatsoever in the policy set forth for Internet use, whose tenets are that those
who abide by the existing regulations will continue to gain access to the Net; that the access by Cubans to the Internet
will continue to rise as allowed by connectivity and that we are going to crack down on all unlawful acts to defend the
Net.
I would highly appreciate if this article is published in your prestigious publication.
- Miguel Ramirez
Cuban Ambassador