By Charles Moore, Editor of The Daily Telegraph
For Full Story see…
"What's happening with George Galloway, then?" people ask me, and I find that many of them think that The Daily
Telegraph has long since received a libel writ from the Labour MP. This is not surprising, for in the two months since
we published official Iraqi documents purporting to show that Mr Galloway took large sums from Saddam Hussein's regime,
the Labour backbencher has spoken repeatedly, excitedly and inaccurately about the case.
He has talked of "black propaganda" and "intelligence hocus-pocus". He has even suggested that we might be in the
business of churning out forgeries in Arabic to destroy him. He has spread scurrilous misrepresentations of our
correspondent David Blair's account of how he found these documents. But he has failed to cast any doubt on their
authenticity. And, no, he has not yet issued a libel writ.
What Mr Galloway can now justifiably say is that an entirely different set of documents was doubtful. Yesterday the
Christian Science Monitor in Boston confirmed that papers it published purporting to show that Mr Galloway accepted
Iraqi largesse running into millions of dollars were "almost certainly" fakes. The Mail on Sunday has already exposed as
crude forgeries further papers from the same source.
These revelations have no bearing whatsoever on our story, but in telling Sky News yesterday how the Monitor's experts
had unmasked their documents as forgeries, Mr Galloway promised that ours too would "meet the same fate". He was
ignoring the fact that those experts went on to say they believed ours to be consistent with genuine Iraqi documents.
"This tells you something," he hinted to BBC radio on Tuesday. "There is a market in forged documents about me." There
may be a market, but The Daily Telegraph is not part of it: we paid nothing for our story, no one supplied it to us, and
our documents are not forged.
For Full Story see…