Stateside with Rosalea
Custard, anyone?
By Rosalea Barker
For those who haven't seen it on-line, here is the last paragraph of Michael Kelly's column in the Atlantic Monthly,
which I referred to yesterday. It's in today's "For the record" section of http://www.theatlantic.com:
"The argument [over Iraq] concerns whether the employment of this almost unfathomable [military] power will be largely
for good, leading to the liberation of a tyrannized people and the spread of freedom, or largely for bad, leading to
imperialism and colonialism, with a consequent corruption of America's own values and freedoms. This question is real
enough and more: probably the next hundred years hinges on the answer." —Michael Kelly, in "A Letter from Kuwait City,"
his last column for The Atlantic.
It will be as well to keep those two conflicting outcomes in view as events unfold. Even this morning as, live on
(Pacific-time) breakfast television, the US military helped topple a statue of Saddam Hussein there was some confusion
about which of those outcomes was in progress: at one stage a US soldier draped a US flag over the statue's head. It was
quickly removed, as the PR campaign painting Operation Iraqi Fiefdom to be about liberation not imperialism got back
into full swing.
Even before the flag incident, the rope broke, so it wasn't an easy topple. Nor was it reported on the TV news bulletins
I skimmed through that this statue is in a largely Shi'ite part of Baghdad, so the jubilation may be less that of freed
Iraqis, than jubilation of a sectarian nature.