Stateside With Rosalea: Civility
Ooops! I said I'd provide a Wednesday-lite column and then forgot that I'd have to write it on Monday night, my time.
Blame it on the Civil War. Or at least on the epic documentary called 'The Civil War', which first aired in 1990 and has
now been digitally remastered and will show each night this week on the local PBS channel. Comprised mainly of
photographs from the period, and comments taken from contemporary letters, diaries and official documents, this "film by
Ken Burns" was a huge ratings success when it first aired.
I'm sure it will be now too. For someone like me, who hasn't grown up in the US school system, it's a valuable history
lesson. I had no idea of the numbers of people who slaughtered each other in the fields - thousands at a time because
weaponry was so far in advance of tactics. The fighting happened at too close a range for the bayonet-charge style of
warfare the aging generals had trained on. "Rich man's war; poor man's fight" is how it was called.
It's kind of weird watching this documentary in the midst of today's current affairs. On the one hand it serves to
highlight the awful damage that war inflicts, and on the other it sheds some light on why the US is so full of pride and
arrogance in its dealings with other nations. Its citizens paid an astonishingly high blood price to create this nation
- it was after the trauma of the Civil War that people started saying the United States "is" instead of "are". You can
check out the documentary at http://www.pbs.org/civilwar/
Not that other countries don't pay an astonishingly high blood price to exist or be created. Nor does it excuse any
country from being a civil participant in a civil world - which is what we all hope to live in, surely. The USA reminds
me of a boy I once cared for. Seven years old, he had the build and strength of a stocky 11-year-old, and the mind of a
two-year-old. Fundamentally blind, he needed other people to help him get around but got angry with them if he didn't
get his way, and he had difficulty trusting others. He reacted by hitting out, knowing neither his own strength nor the
social benefits of limiting his use of it. There is no point in pitying such a child or getting angry; you simply have
to get on with the business of offering guidance, discouraging selfishness and encouraging participation as an equal,
not a bully.
BTW, if you're interested in seeing the news-go-round - around in circles and around the world until it disappears up
its own fundament - you should check out Google's newly launched http://news.google.com
- I especially love the disclaimer: "This page was generated entirely by computer algorithms without human editors. No
humans were harmed or even used in the creation of this page."