INDEPENDENT NEWS

Lindsay Perigo: Recycling GE Arguments

Published: Thu 1 Nov 2001 09:57 AM
Lindsay Perigo and his troublemaking libertarian ideas can be delivered everyday to your in-box. Simply visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Perigo and subscribe, or visit www.freeradical.co.nz for the archive.
=====================================================
Today I'm cheating. My editorials are written the night before they appear, in my own time, in my private capacity. It's been a long day at the office, & I lack the motivation to produce a fresh opinion piece, basking instead in the glories of red wine & Tchaikovsky. So I'm going to recycle an old one. The day at the office (Parliament) was dominated by the genetic engineering debate. It occurs to me that it would be timely to reproduce my editorial on the Politically Incorrect Show of March 13 on a related subject, cloning. Similar arguments apply, & the same enemy - mystic-socialist greenies - has to be confronted. In any event, most of you here will be reading it for the first time. So - enjoy!
******
Every advance in mankind's conquest of nature has been resisted by those who believe NATURE should not be conquered. This has been especially true in the field of health & medicine. Anaesthesia, Pasteurisation, penicillin, herbicides & pesticides, vaccination, irradiation &, latterly, genetic modification of food ... all have been clamorously resisted by the religious devotees of a lifestyle of deprivation, disease & dirt. Now the spectre of human cloning looms large, & the same bleaters are wailing their chorus from the caves. Labour MP Diane Yates has a bill to ban cloning before a parliamentary select committee. Green MP Sue Kedgley also favours prohibition. "I am concerned," she says, "that some fertility specialists & researchers seem not to want legislation, preferring to work in an essentially unregulated environment in which the community has very little, if any, say over issues that have profound ethical issues for society."
WHAT profound ethical issues for society? It is a matter between a man, a woman & the relevant specialists. If a man is willing to donate a cell, a woman an egg & her uterus, the specialists their expertise, then that should be the end of the matter, barring any issues of force or fraud. It's said that a human clone might age prematurely, like Dolly the sheep. Frankly, I doubt that any couple, or anyone taking responsibility for the child, would proceed with the exercise until that possibility - & others like it - has been resolved. But the same bleaters against human cloning don't want sheep cloning either - they want to stop the research that would best enable these matters to be ironed out.
Another concern is that an Adolf Hitler might be cloned. So what if one were? The clone might resemble the Hitler in looks & certain personality characteristics, but his behaviour would be over to him. A cloned human being will have exactly the same attribute that sets every human being apart from every other one - a rational faculty & the free will to exercise it as he chooses. A clone of Adolf Hitler would be no more disposed to hate Jews & set about exterminating them than you or I. To say that a clone's behaviour would be identical is to say that Hitler himself had no control over his behaviour - that because of HIS genetic make-up he could not do other than hate Jews & kill them. That's absurd on its face - if it weren't we wouldn't pass judgement on him the way we do.
Scientists, as I say, have always had to contend with religionists who object to tampering with nature in any way. Environmentalism is the new face of the religionists. I like Llewellyn Rockwell's in-your-face response to them, to be reproduced in the upcoming issue of my magazine: "Do killer bees & killer bacteria have 'integrity' worthy of religious respect? To my mind, nature is only valuable if it serves man's needs. If it does not, it must be transformed. ... From time immemorial until the day before yesterday, Western man has seen nature as the enemy, & rightly so. It is dangerous & deadly. For the sake of our own survival, it must be tamed, cut, curbed, controlled." To which I say, Amen! And send in the cloners!

Next in Comment

Were journalists 'just doing their job' in the political resignation of Metiria Turei?
By: Sean Phelan and Leon Salter
Gordon Campbell on the extradition of Julian Assange
By: Gordon Campbell
Gordon Campbell: Islamic State Meets 'The Searchers'
By: Gordon Campbell
Learnings From CJR Analysis of Post-ChCh Media
By: Joseph Cederwall
News Deserts; The Death March of Local Journalism
By: Joseph Cederwall
Julian Assange as Neuroses
By: Binoy Kampmark
The Effort to Relabel Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Shredding Asylum: The Arrest of Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Terms of Asylum and Distraction: Moreno’s Assange Problem
By: Binoy Kampmark
Grand Jury Efforts: Jailing Chelsea Manning
By: Binoy Kampmark
How You Can Be Certain The Charge Against Assange Is a Fraud
By: Caitlin Johnstone
10 Reasons Assange Should Walk Free
By: David Swanson
WikiLeaks Founder Charged in Computer Hacking Conspiracy
By: United States Department of Justice
CPJ troubled by prosecution of Julian Assange
By: Committee to Protect Journalists
The Prosecution Of Assange Is Infinitely Bigger Than Assange
By: Caitlin Johnstone
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media