AUS Tertiary Update
Twenty-nine jobs to be axed from Victoria’s college of
education
Both the Association of University Staff and
the Association of Staff in Tertiary Education have
expressed extreme disappointment that Victoria University is
pressing ahead with plans to cut twenty-two academic and
advisory and seven administrative positions from its college
of education by the end of this year. The original proposal
was for a cut of more than 15 percent to existing staff
numbers, a reduction of twenty-two out of 141 academic
positions and seven out of forty-one general, and closure of
the college’s resource centre.
The proposal was
described by the unions at its release in May as “a crude
shift in emphasis from teacher education to research in
education” based purely on an “arbitrary” figure for
budget overspending. The unions called for both the shape
and scale of the cuts to be seriously reconsidered in order
to maintain the college’s “long and proud history of
producing creative, innovative, and dedicated
graduates”.
However, despite receiving 204 submissions
from staff and students largely opposed to the cuts, the
university has now announced that the cuts will proceed
without any adjustment to the original proposal. “We are
not sure how 204 submissions can fail to have any impact on
the number of proposed job losses when that number was
certainly the result of some arbitrary assumptions,” AUS
organiser Michael Gilchrist said. “This outcome heightens
our overall concerns about the university’s change
processes. We believe that there should have been broader
input on the decision panel.”
“We now believe that it
is vital that an observer nominated by staff be included on
that panel when its members select who stays in employment
and who is made redundant,” he added.
“Staff
deserve at least that degree of assurance about the
objectivity and impartiality of the process. However, we
have so far encountered a staunch refusal from the
university to make this process more open and
transparent,” Mr Gilchrist said.
Commenting on the
logic of cutting jobs to bring the college within an
arbitrary budget, Mr Gilchrist blamed the government as well
as the university. “The Government has effectively reduced
the funding for teacher education by shifting resources
towards research and away from teaching. “But while the
university continues to balance its books with such
enthusiasm, the pressures on high-quality teacher education
caused by funding reductions will not be felt by the
government,” he said.
“We have faith in our members,
who will continue to work to deliver the very best education
for students at the college, but they deserve more
support,” Mr Gilchrist concluded.
Also in Tertiary
Update this week
1. A reprieve for gender and women’s
studies
2. Auckland moves to limit student
numbers
3. Trans-tasman pay disparity not only
concern
4. Students welcome stronger protection for
casuals
5. “Servants” carrying teaching
load
6. Tertiary-education investment on the rise in
China
7. Massive Essex majority opposes
privatisation
8. University presses attempt to reKindle
interest
9. How to turn on a robot
A reprieve for
gender and women’s studies
In a related move,
Victoria’s gender and women’s studies programme, which
had recently been removed from the faculty of humanities and
social sciences to the university’s college of education,
has received at least a temporary reprieve. A unanimous
resolution of the university’s academic board has called
for more consultation on the future of the programme before
any further action is taken.
The resolution, a response
to concerns expressed by staff and students, was moved and
seconded by Professors Janet Holmes of the linguistics
programme and Lydia Wevers of the Stout research centre for
New Zealand studies. It noted that the changes proposed for
the college of education risk the dissolution of the gender
and women’s studies programme and it requires university
management to go back to staff, students, the programme’s
board of studies, and the wider community before taking any
further steps.
Furthermore, the resolution reflects the
continuing struggle gender and women’s studies has had
over the years to reinforce the need for a stand-alone
programme as a necessary complement to the integration of
feminist perspectives into other disciplines.
The
proposed consultation process will pay particular attention
to the disciplinary focus of the programme, its physical
location, and the maintenance and growth of its research and
research-degree programme. The programme has, consequently,
been separated out from the other changes taking place at
the college of education and will have its own budget and
remain on the Kelburn campus, at least until the end of
2009.
A timeline, process, and discussion document for
the consultation will shortly be made available.
Auckland
moves to limit student numbers
The University of Auckland
council has this week approved new limits on student numbers
that will restrict entry to all undergraduate courses from
2009. According to the university, the decision will provide
for better control of student numbers in response, it
claims, to the new Tertiary Education Commission (TEC)
funding model, which moves away from the previous
“bums-on-seats” approach.
The limits on previously
open-entry courses, revealed to the public for the first
time at the council meeting, largely match 2008 admissions.
Typical examples are the bachelor of arts, capped at 2000,
including 120 international students, in 2009 from a 2008
semester one figure of 1679; the bachelor of education at
650, against about 600 in 2008; and the bachelor of theology
capped at 60 against a 2008 admission of
forty-seven.
Commenting on the new limits, AUS Auckland
branch president, Dr Helen Charters, said, “Many AUS
members at Auckland struggle under excessive workloads,
driven in part by cramming too many students into too few
classrooms, with insufficient teaching staff, all a
consequence of long-term under-resourcing of the university
sector. This leads to a poor learning and working
environment all round. However, it is by no means clear that
capping entry to arts and education programmes is the answer
to these problems,” she continued.
“AUS supports
stable long-term funding of universities but, in return,
those universities have an obligation to serve society at
large. There is a real and predicted shortfall of teachers
in New Zealand; to limit entry to education programmes in
these circumstances seems irrational,” said Dr
Charters.
“Moreover, open entry to the bachelor of arts
degree is a historic right of all New Zealanders, enabling
them to pursue an advanced education in areas of broad
social, political, and ethical concern. Arts programmes
teach people to be innovative and critical thinkers, a
valuable resource in any society,” she
concluded.
Trans-tasman pay disparity not only
concern
Research conducted for the Association of Staff
in Tertiary Education (ASTE) reveals that polytechnic
lecturers in New Zealand are paid approximately 60 percent
of the salaries of their equivalents in Australia’s
Technical and Further Education system. The research mirrors
the recent Deloitte report, commissioned by the New Zealand
Vice-Chancellors’ Committee, indicating that New Zealand
university salaries are lagging behind corresponding
Australian and other international rates.
Focusing on
twenty-three different points on the salary scale, the
research shows that the New Zealand polytechnic rates,
adjusted for purchasing-power parity, range between 50 and
62.5 percent of equivalent Australian rates. Overall,
average New Zealand rates were 58.5 percent of the
Australian average.
Average purchasing power of the New
Zealand polytechnic rates ranged from $US18,010 to $US51,695
against Australian adjusted rates of $US28.825 to $US98,845.
The differential is lowest at the bottom of the salary
scale, with New Zealand salaries 62.5 percent of those of
Australian equivalents, and highest towards the top, where,
for example, New Zealand’s $US41,088 is a fraction over
half of Australia’s $US81,835.
Commenting on the
figures, ASTE national secretary Sharn Riggs said that they
form only part of a much broader research project stemming
from the formation of a joint employer and union working
party on institute of technology and polytechnic salaries.
“It is no surprise that the figures show such a
disparity,” she said.
“However, we are equally
concerned about other ramifications of the evidence emerging
from the overall research project. In particular, we are
worried about the implications for internal New Zealand
markets and the likely effect of the sector’s low salaries
on its relationships with other sectors from which
polytechnic lecturers have previously been recruited and to
which they are attracted by higher rates of pay,” she
added.
Students welcome stronger protection for
casuals
University of Auckland students have welcomed
this week’s government announcement of its intention to
legislate for increased protections for temporary and casual
workers and to run awareness campaigns to ensure that
employees know their rights at work. “These developments
are highly relevant to students,” said Auckland University
Students’ Association president, David Do.
“Many
university stuudents balance part-time work with their
studies, and tend to work in areas with a high concentration
of casual employment, namely the hospitality, service,
retail, and call-centre areas,” he said. “Many students
turn to part-time work to support themselves, often because
they’re not eligible for support through student
allowances.”
“Even borrowing living costs through
student loans is not enough even to cover rent in most parts
of Auckland. Some international students also work
part-time, and are more likely to be subject to substandard
treatment. They face increased difficulties due to English
language barriers and lack of knowledge about New Zealand
conditions,” he continued.
“There is potential
misuse of casual employment relationships by employers. It
is not unusual for some students who are effectively
part-time employees to have been kept permanently on casual
contracts. Facing increased financial pressures, student
workers may not be able or willing to assert their rights if
employers do not give them their minimum legal entitlements
in pay, sick leave, training, and holidays,” Mr Do
continued.
“We support all efforts to increase
workers’ and employers’ awareness of their rights at
work, and look forward to joining in any future campaigns
planned in that area.”
World Watch
“Servants”
carrying teaching load
Sessional lecturers in Australia
are the domestic servants of the contemporary campus and
carry as much as 80 percent of the undergraduate teaching
load, according to a new report on the rise of the
casualised class of academic. “In many ways the lifestyle
of the traditional teaching and research academic is totally
dependent on the contribution of sessional staff, in the way
that Victorian middle-class lifestyles were dependent on the
domestic servant,” said the University of Wollongong’s
Professor Rob Castle, spokesperson for the Recognition,
Enhancement, Development (RED) project group.
The report
says that up to 50 percent of Australian university classes
are taught by sessional staff and that official figures,
stated as full-time equivalents, do not make clear the
sector’s dependence on casualised academics. In two of the
sixteen universities that took part in the RED project,
sessional staff led 80 percent of undergraduate classes.
The National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) is seeking
to place strict limits on the number and kind of casual
appointments as a central part of its national wage
campaign. Under Howard-era collective agreements, some not
due to expire until June next year, universities are
prohibited from capping casual employment. NTEU general
secretary Grahame McCulloch has expressed concern at an
estimated 60 percent increase in casual appointments during
the Howard years.
Professor Castle noted, however, that
the use of sessional staff did not automatically imply
anything about the quality of teaching. Part-time teachers
came in all shapes and sizes, from highly qualified experts
through to PhD students starting careers. “If anything, we
are better off than the US, where so much is done by
teaching assistants,” Professor Castle said.
He
further suggested that the trend towards casualisation could
not be turned back. “The reality is that there is not
going to be a great deal of extra funding for universities,
so the use of sessionals is unavoidable and the overwhelming
pressure on academics makes them essential,” he
concluded.
From Stephen Matchett in The
Australian
Tertiary-education investment on the rise in
China
China’s increasing investment in education will
accelerate economic development, lead to rapid wage rises
and increased consumer demand, and slow population growth,
says a new report from MAPI, the Arlington, Virginia-based
Manufacturers’ Alliance.
The report, China’s
Educational Performance: Implications for global
competitiveness, social stability and long-term development,
is the latest in a series of MAPI research reports on the
evolution of the Chinese economy and its impact on the
emerging global economic order.
Since the 1990s, when
China made higher education a priority, the proportion of
graduates from senior secondary schools who go on to pursue
higher education has risen significantly, from nearly half
in 1995 to 75 percent by 2006. The gross enrolment ratio in
tertiary education rose from 6 percent in 1999 to 20 percent
in 2005, more than India’s 11 percent and Vietnam’s 16
percent, but well behind Japan’s 55 percent and the United
States’ 83 percent. However, a recent Rand Corporation
report notes that China is graduating more scientists and
engineers than the US.
More than half of Chinese students
graduate in natural sciences and engineering, compared with
a world average of 27 percent and only 17 percent in the US.
In 2006, 36 percent of Chinese undergraduate degrees and 37
percent of graduate degrees were awarded in engineering,
whereas fewer than 7 percent of US undergraduate degrees
awarded in 2004 were in engineering.
In January 2006,
China initiated a fifteen-year medium to long-term plan for
the development of science and technology. The nation aims
to become an “innovation-oriented society” by 2020 and a
world leader in science and technology by 2050.
From
Subbiah Arunachalam in University World News
Massive Essex
majority opposes privatisation
Staff at Essex University
in the United Kingdom have delivered a massive rejection of
the university’s plans to set up a joint venture to teach
students with private company INTO. In an open referendum,
hosted by the University and College Union (UCU), 90 percent
of staff voting said they believed that any
“partnership” with INTO would damage the
university.
INTO has a track record of paying staff less
and signing deals that consign land over to property
speculators, while locking universities into highly
disadvantageous thirty-five-year leases. UCU members in INTO
ventures have raised concerns about the quality of its
provision. INTO’s chairman, Andrew Colin, has admitted
that “rates of pay are probably worse” at his ventures
and INTO does not recognise unions. INTO failed to declare
its company accounts on time last year and made a loss of
$NZ4.18 million in 2006.
The referendum is a blow for the
university’s plans, indicating that the vice-chancellor
has failed to convince staff that the joint venture would do
anything other than damage their university. It is also a
blow for INTO, which is trying to sign a series of deals
with universities in the face of growing opposition from
university staff.
UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said,
“I urge the vice-chancellor to draw back from plans which
have little or no support among the staff and students of
the university. This vote is yet another indication that UCU
is right to oppose the creeping privatisation of higher
education.”
“We are not prepared,” she said, “to
watch our universities risk hard-won reputations and future
financial health by signing capital and revenue over to what
are, in effect, private-sector property developers. We’ve
seen the disastrous consequences of this kind of
privatisation across the public sector and will fight it
wherever it rears its head.”
University presses attempt
to reKindle interest
Launched last November, and already
attracting considerable attention, Kindle, Amazon’s
portable reader that allows for downloading of complete
books, has been hailed as potentially opening up a new kind
of reading experience. Of course, many such claims have
previously been made, but Kindle’s Amazon backing has
given it a market that is attractive to many publishers,
including university presses.
By the beginning of the US
autumn, Princeton plans to have several hundred books
available for sale through Kindle. Yale University Press and
Oxford University Press already have a similar presence
there. The University of California Press recently had about
forty of its volumes placed on Kindle and is gearing up for
more.
Press officials say that they are generally putting
a wide selection of current and backlist volumes on Kindle,
and aren’t selecting any one particular kind of volume as
more likely to sell in this format. However, you are
unlikely to find on Kindle any books that benefit from
illustrations. Permission is so difficult to obtain for
online books that most presses aren’t trying, and many
believe that Kindle doesn’t yet provide optimal viewing
for all illustrations. Yale, for example, is known for its
publishing of art books, but is not putting them on
Kindle.
The university presses participating in Kindle
were reluctant to describe the specific financial
arrangements they have with Amazon (which also declined to
discuss them), but said that they were revenue-sharing
deals, and that preparing the books for release on Kindle
was not particularly burdensome or expensive.
From Inside
Higher Ed
How to turn on a robot
Academics from around
the world met recently at the University of Maastricht in
the Netherlands at the First International Conference on
Human-Robot Personal Relationships to discuss a
not-so-distant future when robots care for the elderly,
participate in the military, and are used as sex partners.
One speaker gave her talk from California via a
robot-mounted view screen.
The conference was organised
by David Levy, author of Love and Sex With Robots, who
expects that, in about forty years, artificial intelligence
will have progressed to the point where human-robot dating
will be commonplace. “Being loved by a robot?” Levy
asks. “It sounds a bit weird, but someday, for many, many
people, being in love with a robot will be just as good as
love with a human.”
Conference participants grappled
with other issues of a complicated, roboticised future. Will
having perfect, compliant robots make us less patient with
vexing human relationships? Will using female robots for
cleaning promote gender stereotypes? If you force your robot
to have sex with you, is it rape?
Ron Arkin, a professor
of computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology who
participated in the conference, says the questions aren’t
spurious. Just as pornography provided incentive for the
development of videorecording and the internet, Professor
Arkin says, sex will drive robotic developments. “It’s
gonna be here before we know it,” he claims. “If the
questions aren’t asked, the technology will just show up
on your doorstep.”
From Ingrid Norton in The Chronicle
of Higher Education
More international news
More
international news can be found on University World
News:
http://www.universityworldnews.com
AUS Tertiary
Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and distributed
freely to members of the Association of University Staff and
others. Back issues are available on the AUS website:
www.aus.ac.nz. Direct inquiries should be made to the
editor, email:
editor@aus.ac.nz.