News Release
Bloodline argument racist rubbish, says researcher
National Party leader Don Brash’s suggestion that Mäori are no longer a distinct indigenous people due to intermarriage
is inherently racist, and intended to divide, says Massey sociologist Dr Avril Bell.
Dr Bell, who researches both Mäori and Päkehä identities, says that Dr Brash is being disingenuous when he acknowledges
that many New Zealanders identify as Mäori, while arguing that Mäori are no longer a distinct people.
“While Dr Brash might claim to be just stating the facts, he is appealing to racist sentiments against Mäori. To state
that there are few, or no, full-blooded Mäori left is not a simple statement of fact. The tenor of this kind of comment
is to question the validity of claims to Mäori identity,” Dr Bell says.
The underlying assumption that to be a “real” Mäori a person had to be “full-blooded” is an inappropriate and archaic
way to define cultural identity that smacks of 19th century race theory, she says.
“People don’t actually have different blood. It is our DNA that determines things like physical characteristics and skin
colour. Within Maori culture, identity claims are based on whakapapa which, unlike the blood metaphor, works to include
rather than to divide people. Having one ancestor with links to a particular hapü or iwi can be the basis of a claim to
belong to that hapü or iwi. That claim isn’t diluted because the rest of your ancestors come from elsewhere.”
She says the racism inherent in this kind of argument is clear when you consider how it is used only against non-white
peoples. “We never hear claims to Päkehä identity being questioned on the basis of their not being full-blooded. It is
always used to question the identity claims of minority groups. You have to ask why that is.”
ENDS