We stand for education.
Media Release
23 September 2003
Secondary specific solutions needed
Secondary-specific, rather than one size fits all, solutions are needed to further enhance secondary education in New
Zealand, PPTA president Phil Smith said today.
In a speech to PPTA’s Annual Conference, Mr Smith said recent calls for a unified teaching service ignored the
intellectual and workload demands of senior assessment and the particular challenges of teaching adolescents and would
not advance education in New Zealand.
“We are proud to be an independent union that fights its own battles and does not ride on the coat-tails of another.
Though our history does show that we certainly have been occasionally militant, this has brought gains for not only
secondary education, but for the whole compulsory education sector.”
Mr Smith applauded the progress made to improve secondary teachers’ working conditions through last year’s arbitrated
settlement.
“The ADR process and the independent panel’s recommendations were a complete vindication of our stand over pay and
conditions – all along we wanted a secondary-specific solution to the problems of recruitment and retention we were
facing, and the panel delivered this.”
However, he said the panel’s findings had inevitably come up against a pay system which treated secondary teachers
exactly the same as primary teachers, regardless of needs.
“It became clear that the unexpectedly high cost of the panel’s proposals meant that when the unfinished business of the
degree equivalent teachers came to be sorted out, the Government wanted to dramatically restrict the flow-on costs to
primary teachers.
“We hope the new national diploma which the Minister announces tomorrow will present a real solution to this issue.”
Mr Smith said PPTA looked forward to working with the Government and the Ministry of Education to achieve improvements
in classroom teaching and student achievement. However, he said teachers were not miracle workers and it was important
the social context in which they operated was taken into account.
“We are not happy when our input is devalued and we are fobbed off with short-sighted, unrealistic solutions to problems
that cry out for an effective answer.
“What we ask for, and what we still seek, is meaningful, constructive, problem-solving dialogue with politicians and the
appropriate agencies of the state on the many issues that need addressing in our sector. This is not asking for the
moon!”
ENDS