N30 Black Bloc Communique
by ACME Collective 10:48am Sat Dec 4 '99
A communique from one section of the black bloc of N30 in Seattle
On November 30, several groups of individuals in black bloc attacked various corporate targets in downtown Seattle.
Among them were (to name just a few):
Fidelity Investment (major investor in Occidental Petroleum, the bane of the U'wa tribe in Columbia) Bank of America,
US Bancorp, Key Bank and Washington Mutual Bank (financial institutions key in the expansion of corporate repression)
Old Navy, Banana Republic and the GAP (as Fisher family businesses, rapers of Northwest forest lands and sweatshop
laborers) NikeTown and Levi's (whose overpriced products are made in sweatshops) McDonald's (slave-wage fast-food
peddlers responsible for destruction of tropical rainforests for grazing land and slaughter of animals) Starbucks
(peddlers of an addictive substance whose products are harvested at below-poverty wages by farmers who are forced to
destroy their own forests in the process) Warner Bros. (media monopolists) Planet Hollywood (for being Planet Hollywood)
This activity lasted for over 5 hours and involved the breaking of storefront windows and doors and defacing of facades.
Slingshots, newspaper boxes, sledge hammers, mallets, crowbars and nail-pullers were used to strategically destroy
corporate property and gain access (one of the three targeted Starbucks and Niketown were looted). Eggs filled with
glass etching solution, paint-balls and spray-paint were also used.
The black bloc was a loosely organized cluster of affinity groups and individuals who roamed around downtown, pulled
this way by a vulnerable and significant storefront and that way by the sight of a police formation. Unlike the vast
majority of activists who were pepper-sprayed, tear-gassed and shot at with rubber bullets on several occasions, most of
our section of the black bloc escaped serious injury by remaining constantly in motion and avoiding engagement with the
police. We buddied up, kept tight and watched each others' backs. Those attacked by federal thugs were un-arrested by
quick-thinking and organized members of the black bloc. The sense of solidarity was awe-inspiring.
THE PEACE POLICE
Unfortunately, the presence and persistence of "peace police" was quite disturbing. On at least 6 separate occasions,
so-called "non-violent" activists physically attacked individuals who targeted corporate property. Some even went so far
as to stand in front of the Niketown super store and tackle and shove the black bloc away. Indeed, such self-described
"peace-keepers" posed a much greater threat to individuals in the black bloc than the notoriously violent uniformed
"peace-keepers" sanctioned by the state (undercover officers have even used the cover of the activist peace-keepers to
ambush those who engage in corporate property destruction).
RESPONSE TO THE BLACK BLOC
Response to the black bloc has highlighted some of the contradictions and internal oppressions of the "nonviolent
activist" community. Aside from the obvious hypocrisy of those who engaged in violence against black-clad and masked
people (many of whom were harassed despite the fact that they never engaged in property destruction), there is the
racism of privileged activists who can afford to ignore the violence perpetrated against the bulk of society and the
natural world in the name of private property rights. Window-smashing has engaged and inspired many of the most
oppressed members of Seattle's community more than any giant puppets or sea turtle costumes ever could (not to disparage
the effectiveness of those tools in other communities).
TEN MYTHS ABOUT THE BLACK BLOC
Here's a little something to dispel the myths that have been circulating about the N30 black bloc:
1. "They are all a bunch of Eugene anarchists." While a few may be anarchists from Eugene, we hail from all over the
United States, including Seattle. In any case, most of us are familiar with local issues in Seattle (for instance, the
recent occupation of downtown by some of the most nefarious of multinational retailers).
2. "They are all followers of John Zerzan." A lot of rumors have been circulating that we are followers of John Zerzan,
an anarcho-primitivist author from Eugene who advocates property destruction. While some of us may appreciate his
writings and analyses, he is in no sense our leader, directly, indirectly, philosophically or otherwise.
3. "The mass public squat is the headquarters of the anarchists who destroyed property on November 30th." In reality,
most of the people in the "Autonomous Zone" squat are residents of Seattle who have spent most of their time since its
opening on the 28th in the squat. While they may know of one-another, the two groups are not co-extensive and in no case
could the squat be considered the headquarters of people who destroyed property.
4. "They escalated situations on the 30th, leading to the tear-gassing of passive, non-violent protesters." To answer
this, we need only note that tear-gassing, pepper-spraying and the shooting of rubber bullets all began before the black
blocs (as far as we know) started engaging in property destruction. In addition, we must resist the tendency to
establish a causal relationship between police repression and protest in any form, whether it involved property
destruction or not. The police are charged with protecting the interests of the wealthy few and the blame for the
violence cannot be placed upon those who protest those interests.
5. Conversely: "They acted in response to the police repression." While this might be a more positive representation of
the black bloc, it is nevertheless false. We refuse to be misconstrued as a purely reactionary force. While the logic of
the black bloc may not make sense to some, it is in any case a pro-active logic.
6. "They are a bunch of angry adolescent boys." Aside from the fact that it belies a disturbing ageism and sexism, it is
false. Property destruction is not merely macho rabble-rousing or testosterone-laden angst release. Nor is it displaced
and reactionary anger. It is strategically and specifically targeted direct action against corporate interests.
7. "They just want to fight." This is pretty absurd, and it conveniently ignores the eagerness of "peace police" to
fight us. Of all the groups engaging in direct action, the black bloc was perhaps the least interested in engaging the
authorities and we certainly had no interest in fighting with other anti-WTO activists (despite some rather strong
disagreements over tactics).
8. "They are a chaotic, disorganized and opportunistic mob." While many of us could surely spend days arguing over what
"chaotic" means, we were certainly not disorganized. The organization may have been fluid and dynamic, but it was tight.
As for the charge of opportunism, it would be hard to imagine who of the thousands in attendance _didn't_ take advantage
of the opportunity created in Seattle to advance their agenda. The question becomes, then, whether or not we helped
create that opportunity and most of us certainly did (which leads us to the next myth):
9. "They don't know the issues" or "they aren't activists who've been working on this." While we may not be professional
activists, we've all been working on this convergence in Seattle for months. Some of us did work in our home-towns and
others came to Seattle months in advance to work on it. To be sure, we were responsible for many hundreds of people who
came out on the streets on the 30th, only a very small minority of which had anything to do with the black bloc. Most of
us have been studying the effects of the global economy, genetic engineering, resource extraction, transportation, labor
practices, elimination of indigenous autonomy, animal rights and human rights and we've been doing activism on these
issues for many years. We are neither ill-informed nor unexperienced.
10. "Masked anarchists are anti-democratic and secretive because they hide their identities." Let's face it (with or
without a mask)--we aren't living in a democracy right now. If this week has not made it plain enough, let us remind
you--we are living in a police state. People tell us that if we really think that we're right, we wouldn't be hiding
behind masks. "The truth will prevail" is the assertion. While this is a fine and noble goal, it does not jive with the
present reality. Those who pose the greatest threat to the interests of Capital and State will be persecuted. Some
pacifists would have us accept this persecution gleefully. Others would tell us that it is a worthy sacrifice. We are
not so morose. Nor do we feel we have the privilege to accept persecution as a sacrifice: persecution to us is a daily
inevitability and we treasure our few freedoms. To accept incarceration as a form of flattery betrays a large amount of
"first world" privilege. We feel that an attack on private property is necessary if we are to rebuild a world which is
useful, healthful and joyful for everyone. And this despite the fact that hypertrophied private property rights in this
country translate into felony charges for any property destruction over $250.
MOTIVATIONS OF THE BLACK BLOC
The primary purpose of this communique is to diffuse some of the aura of mystery that surrounds the black bloc and make
some of its motivations more transparent, since our masks cannot be.
ON THE VIOLENCE OF PROPERTY
We contend that property destruction is not a violent activity unless it destroys lives or causes pain in the process.
By this definition, private property--especially corporate private property--is itself infinitely more violent than any
action taken against it. Private property should be distinguished from personal property. The latter is based upon use
while the former is based upon trade. The premise of personal property is that each of us has what s/he needs. The
premise of private property is that each of us has something that someone else needs or wants.
In a society based on private property rights, those who are able to accrue more of what others need or want have
greater power. By extension, they wield greater control over what others perceive as needs and desires, usually in the
interest of increasing profit to themselves. Advocates of "free trade" would like to see this process to its logical
conclusion: a network of a few industry monopolists with ultimate control over the lives of the everyone else. Advocates
of "fair trade" would like to see this process mitigated by government regulations meant to superficially impose basic
As anarchists, we despise both positions. Private property--and capitalism, by extension--is intrinsically violent and
repressive and cannot be reformed or mitigated. Whether the power of everyone is concentrated into the hands of a few
corporate heads or diverted into a regulatory apparatus charged with mitigating the disasters of the latter, no one can
be as free or as powerful as they could be in a non-hierarchical society. When we smash a window, we aim to destroy the
thin veneer of legitimacy that surrounds private property rights. At the same time, we exorcise that set of violent and
destructive social relationships which has been imbued in almost everything around us.
By "destroying" private property, we convert its limited exchange value into an expanded use value. A storefront window
becomes a vent to let some fresh air into the oppressive atmosphere of a retail outlet (at least until the police decide
to tear-gas a nearby road blockade). A newspaper box becomes a tool for creating such vents or a small blockade for the
reclamation of public space or an object to improve one's vantage point by standing on it.. A dumpster becomes an
obstruction to a phalanx of rioting cops and a source of heat and light. A building facade becomes a message board to
record brainstorm ideas for a better world. After N30, many people will never see a shop window or a hammer the same way
again. The potential uses of an entire cityscape have increased a thousand-fold. The number of broken windows pales in
comparison to the number broken spells--spells cast by a corporate hegemony to lull us into forgetfulness of all the
violence committed in the name of private property rights and of all the potential of a society without them. Broken
windows can be boarded up (with yet more waste of our forests) and eventually replaced, but the shattering of
assumptions will hopefully persist for some time to come.
Against Capital and State,
the ACME Collective
Disclaimer: these observations and analyses represent only those of the ACME Collective and should not be construed to
be representative of the rest of the black bloc on N30 or anyone else who engaged in riot or property destruction that