ANZ warns farmers RBNZ intervention may mean higher borrowing costs
(Corrects details of ANZ's agricultural lending in 4th par)
By Jenny Ruth
May 3 (BusinessDesk) - ANZ Bank has warned its farming customers they face higher borrowing costs almost immediately due
to Reserve Bank intervention, even though wholesale interest rates have been falling sharply for more than a year.
In a letter sent to those and other business customers last month, Mark Hiddleston, ANZ’s commercial and agri division
managing director, says the Reserve Bank told ANZ in February that it would have to have to increase the amount of
capital it holds against agricultural loans by June 30.
“This increase is because we currently hold less capital for our agri loans than other banks and the RBNZ believes the
quality of our loan book is not sufficiently better than the others to justify that lower amount,” Hiddleston’s letter
says.
ANZ Bank is New Zealand’s largest. Its results earlier this week showed its share of the $62.5 billion agricultural
lending market stood at 28.5 percent in February.
ANZ has been gradually reducing its agricultural exposure and its market share has dropped from 39.1 percent in
September 2010.
“As you would appreciate, the cost of capital, whilst not the only driver, is a material input cost of doing business,”
Hiddleston says.
“Like most businesses, significant increases in material input costs generally lead to an increase in prices for
customers,” his letter says.
In the wholesale market, the two-year swap rate has dropped about 30 percent from 2.31 percent in April last year to
1.62 percent currently.
“In the immediate future, we intend to await the outcome of the May official cash rate determination from the RBNZ
before we decide what movement, if any, there will be to interest rates on our agri loans,” it says.
“A reduction in the OCR could assist in the near term in absorbing capital costs that would potentially otherwise need
to be passed onto our agri customers. We’ll let you know if this first development impacts you.”
The OCR decision and monetary policy statement will be delivered on May 8. While some economists are expecting an OCR
cut, ANZ’s own chief economist, Sharon Zollner, expects the central bank to hold off until August.
In May last year, the Reserve Bank revealed the results of a benchmarking exercise it set the four major banks, ANZ, ASB
Bank, Bank of New Zealand and Westpac, asking them to report on how much capital they would need to support a
hypothetical portfolio of loans to 20 dairy farms.
Each of these banks uses its own internal models for calculating its risk-weighted capital requirement to meet
regulatory minimums.
The other smaller banks in New Zealand – the big four account for about 88 percent of New Zealand’s banking system – are
forced to use standardised models which means they have to hold more capital proportionately and are therefore
competitively disadvantaged.
While the central bank didn’t name which bank produced which outcome in the dairy portfolio test, it found an
extraordinary 40 percentage-point difference between the highest and lowest average risk-weights among the big four.
“The provisions results show significant variation in model outcomes, even for the same level of underlying risk,” the
Reserve Bank said at the time.
It was this huge disparity that was one of the factors that fuelled the higher capital proposals the central bank is
currently consulting on – the consultation period is set to close on May 17.
The proposals include a near doubling the minimum tier 1 capital, or equity, each of the big four banks has to hold from
8.5 percent to 16 percent. The benefit they get from using their internal models will also be reduced to 90 percent of
the results the standardised models produce.
Currently, banks on average have about 12 percent of risk-weighted tier 1 capital.
The Reserve Bank is proposing a five-year phase-in period for the change. ANZ's letter is the first public indication
that any of the banks have been forced to increase capital earlier, even under the existing rules.
In February, the Reserve Bank released information showing that ANZ currently has to hold just over half the capital
that government-owned Kiwibank is forced to hold to back every $100 of mortgage lending.
Nevertheless, the Reserve Bank has approved the models ANZ has been using from 2008. So while ANZ may have been
extracting maximum benefit, it is clear that it has not flouted the rules.
Hiddleston says the impacts from the central bank’s capital proposals “are likely to be significant on those customers
borrowing money who are involved in the property, commercial and agri sectors” and suggests those customers should start
planning for that.
“We think it is prudent to help you plan to reduce your debt as much as you can, restructure you facility limits or pay
down where you may have credit funds elsewhere,” his letter advises.
“You should also think carefully about your borrowing requirements in the near future, including factoring in potential
increases in borrowing costs.”
(BusinessDesk)
ends