Trade Me may reap $22.5M more real estate ad revenue by hiking fees, fending off rivals
By Tina Morrison
March 12 (BusinessDesk) – Trade Me Group will probably succeed in forcing real estate agents to accept higher fees,
adding $22.5 million of property advertising revenue by 2017 as it pushes back on a challenge from smaller,
industry-owned rival realestate.co.nz.
Property is seen as the key growth engine for Trade Me’s classified advertising business as it faces flat revenues in
its other main general auctions business. In a sign that rivalry for online property listings has heated up in the past
six months, realestate.co.nz poached Trade Me’s former property head Brendon Skipper, prompting Trade Me to hire former
QV executive Nigel Jeffries, who has 15 years’ experience in senior technology and property data roles, as a
replacement.
“Given the calibre of the candidate, we think this sends a clear signal that Trade Me aims to build a large and very
valuable property business over the next three to five years,” Craigs Investment Partners research analyst Stephen
Ridgewell said in a report. “We see property as a ‘winner takes all’ market in New Zealand rather than one where two
major players can co-exist.”
Ridgewell estimates Trade Me will spend $5.2 million on marketing in the second half of this financial year after
promotional costs jumped 153 percent to $3.2 million in the first half as it sought to lure real estate agents to its
auction site and overhauled its fee structure. The prize is an extra $22.5 million in sales over the next three years,
he says.
Trade Me currently earns about $50 from a property agency listing as the firms take advantage of a $999 cap on their
total spend, according to Ridgewell’s estimate. The company wants to move to a straight fee of about $159 for each
agency property listing, which it expects agents to pass on to sellers. Home owners currently pay about $400 for a
private listing and may pay 10 times that for an urban newspaper campaign.
“We’re aiming to grow our piece of the pie but we think online should receive a bigger slice of marketing spend in
relation to house sales to better reflect the value it delivers,” said Trade Me chief executive Jon Macdonald. “We
envisage a situation where vendors pay less overall to market their house, but upweight their spend on online marketing
in line with the value it delivers.”
He told an earnings conference call last month that where Trade Me is competing with print media for the vendor’s
marketing spend, “we have scope to substantially increase our yield while reducing the direct cost borne by the agent.”
Some 68 percent of buyers use Trade Me as their primary channel for property hunting, while 6 percent use
realestate.co.nz and 4 percent use newspapers, according to data Trade Me commissioned from Perceptive Research.
Trade Me estimates it has about a 15 percent, or $18 million, share of the total $115 million property-for-sale
classified advertising market in New Zealand. Macdonald declined to give a future target level.
Agents started moving to Trade Me’s new charging regime in November and by the beginning of February, real estate
offices accounting for over half of all ‘for-sale’ listings were on the new pricing plan, Macdonald said.
Though there had been a “strong reaction” against the change by some agents, they were the exception rather than the
rule, accounting for less than 2 percent of real estate agency offices and holding less than 2 percent of total
inventory, Macdonald said. The company was currently in “sensitive discussions” with major agencies.
The timing and quantum of Trade Me fee negotiations with agents is the key swing factor in determining the company’s
earnings for the second half of its financial year, Craigs’ Ridgewell said.
He pulled back his expectations for extra revenue on concern Trade Me might not be able to push through all the
increases it seeks with the ‘big six’ agencies, who control 80 percent of listings. Existing agreements with the large
national franchises all expire by the end of 2014 and Trade Me is seeking to progressively renegotiate terms.
Should the company prove successful, Trade Me could pull in $39.9 million of total ‘for sale’ revenue by 2017, from
$15.8 million in its 2013 financial year, Ridgewell estimates. If it loses its battle with agents, leading to volumes
falling 50 percent and resulting in flat yields, revenue would likely grow to just $17.4 million by 2017, he said.
“Trade Me has a strong market position and should eventually come out on top,” Ridgewell said.
Trade Me’s main online competitor, realestate.co.nz, achieves just $3 million in annual for-sale listings revenue,
according to a blog by Alistair Helm, the founder of the rival site who departed prior to the appointment of Trade Me’s
Skipper. Trade Me’s property service has more than five times the traffic of realestate.co.nz and also includes private
listings.
The shares fell 0.5 percent to $3.93 today and have fallen 2.7 percent this year.
(BusinessDesk)