29 March 2012
Lombard verdicts highlight directors’ duties, says FMA
The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) today acknowledged the High Court’s sentencing of four directors of Lombard
Finance & Investments.
“The guilty verdicts in this case, and the sentences imposed, illustrate the obligation on directors to ensure that
investors are properly informed, and are kept informed,” FMA CEO Sean Hughes said.
“These verdicts, like those in the earlier Nathans Finance case, are a reminder to directors and their advisers that
timely, accurate and meaningful disclosure to investors is an obligation which cannot be delayed or delegated to others.
These responsibilities are hallmarks of New Zealand’s disclosure regime.
“FMA is keen to help directors get these obligations right. We have a process underway to provide the market with
further guidance.”
In his 24 February judgment Justice Dobson said the primary issue was the adequacy and accuracy of disclosure.
New Zealand’s disclosure regime “intended that investors be in a position to make decisions for themselves by being
adequately informed on material matters, rather than making an investment decision in reliance on an assessment of the
quality of judgment of those who would become custodians of their investments,” the judgment said.
Lombard Finance & Investments was placed in receivership in April 2008 owing $111 million to around 3,600 investors.
Sir Douglas Graham, Michael Reeves, Lawrence Bryant, and William Jeffries were found guilty on 24 February 2012 of four
charges under section 58 of the Securities Act on the basis Lombard’s December 2007 prospectus and three investment
statements contained false statements.
The value of investments and reinvestments made during the currency of the December 2007 offer documents was
approximately $10.45 million.
ENDS