NZCID Media Release
10 October 2008
Inadequate infrastructure inhibiting NZ's growth
An executive opinion survey undertaken as part of the World Economic Forum's latest Global Competitiveness Report has
ranked New Zealand's inadequate infrastructure as the most problematic factor for doing business.
While ranked 24th overall for its relative global competitiveness, New Zealand ranked 50th for the adequacy of its
infrastructure with transport and energy seen as the key areas of concern. Other countries of similar size to New
Zealand such as Finland and Denmark were ranked in the top 10, while Australia was ranked 25th internationally for the
quality of its infrastructure.
"The survey results are important because they show how domestic and international business sees New Zealand from an
investment perspective", says Council for Infrastructure Development chief executive, Stephen Selwood.
"Companies wanting to invest for growth seek locations with the necessary infrastructure to support their investments
and lift overall productivity Constrained investment means lower growth, fewer jobs, and, in the end, lower incomes.
"The report showed New Zealand's income per head (as measured by GDP per capita) continuing to lag behind the average
for OECD nations. In 1980 New Zealand's GDP per capita matched the OECD average. By 2007 New Zealand was 30% below the
OECD average, and the gap is widening.
"Lifting New Zealand's potential depends on enhancing capacity for the movement of people, goods, energy and
information between different places domestically and internationally. Improvements in terms of time and cost can reduce
the disadvantages of distance and have significant positive impacts on national productivity.
"Physical networks such as communications, roads, public transport, energy and water are of particular relevance since
they influence the location, timing and extent of development and growth.
"Social infrastructure, such as schools, hospitals, recreational, conference and tourism facilities are central to
supporting regional development.
"New Zealand's poor ranking for the quality of its infrastructure underlines the need for the incoming government to
keep its focus clearly on investment to lift the nation's overall economic performance", Selwood says.
The Global Competitiveness Report findings can be accessed at: www.weforum.org
ENDS