Grahame Sydney "thinks to new depths" in anti wind farm crusade.
Comments by artist Grahame Sydney regarding the merits of wind generation confirm the old adage - a little knowledge is
a dangerous thing.
Parts of Central Otago, such as Alexandra are regularly calm. However, the places in Otago and Southland where
TrustPower is planning to build wind generation are not, and wind monitoring data gathered over close to two years from
sites at Mahinerangi (which is not "Central Otago" anyway) and Kaiwera Downs (near Gore), clearly show that had the
planned wind generation at those sites been available in the past year the South Island would not be facing the supply
difficulties it is now.
In fact, for the week ending 25 May quoted by Mr Sydney, the sites would have been producing significantly greater than
their projected average annual output of more than 40% of rated capacity, and this week, they would have been producing
almost flat out.
Only last week, My Sydney was on radio telling New Zealanders "there is no wind resource in Central Otago, it is stupid
to build wind farms there, and the only reason companies want to do so is corporate greed".
Excuse me? Corporate greed? How does the investment of hundreds on millions of dollars into something that Mr Sydney
believes won't work equate to corporate greed? Corporate lunacy maybe, if Mr Sydney's claims about the wind resource 80
metres above ground level at the proposed sites was correct - which they are not!
In an environment where natural gas supplies are running out (and are non existent in the South Island anyway), and
shiploads of coal are arriving at the Port of Tauranga carrying coal from Indonesia and Australia to be carted by rail
and truck to the Huntly power station it appears the Mr Sydney would prefer New Zealand to increasingly rely on
generation using imported gas, coal or nuclear fuels. That would result in New Zealand electricity prices climbing
skyward at the same rate as petrol, driven by international fuel prices. In contrast, the actual cost of New Zealand's
water, wind and geothermal energy, which are not driven by international energy prices, remains unchanged, and the key
driver of electricity price increases is an increasing shortage of supply - which My Sydney's objection to new
generation (not only in Otago but in recent days in Marlborough as well) contributes to.
New Zealand continues to have electricity prices that are amongst the cheapest in the world, and it is not in New
Zealand's best interests to create an environment where our electricity prices are at the mercy of international
markets.
Wind and hydro generation are perfect partners - when the wind is blowing hydro-dam, water can be stored for use when it
is not. TrustPower's Lake Mahinerangi is currently at the bottom of its operating range, but if planned wind generation
had been available over the past year, it would have been closer to full, as it should be going into winter.
The same scenario can be applied to the Waitaki system, which would simply not be suffering the low lake levels it is
now had Project Hayes been available to supplement it.
It is fascinating that Mr Sydney on the one hand desires "localised and smaller-scale solutions", yet on the other is
content to stonewall developments that would overcome the need for the Cook Strait cable to be flat out carrying
expensive thermally generated power from the North Island, to keep his South Island lights aglow during winter.
In contrast to the "think big" scenario Mr Sydney refers to, it seems his preference is to "think expensive", "think
cold" and "think dark".
Fortunately, recent research into the acceptability of wind generation to mainstream New Zealanders shows that most
"thinking Kiwis" do not agree with him.
ENDS