INDEPENDENT NEWS

No Bright Future With More Fee Increases

Published: Tue 2 Nov 1999 12:18 AM
Auckland University Students’ Association (AUSA)
Student leaders at the Auckland University Students’ Association (AUSA) are disgusted at a proposed average fee increase of 10.9% for 2000.
The University yesterday briefed student representatives and academic staff on the proposed budget for 2000. Medical school students will be hardest hit with fees increasing a staggering 17% to $9600.
“Many students are suffering severe hardship with current fee levels. This increase will only seek to increase that hardship and $3.44 billion loan burden or even drive them away from tertiary education altogether. 6,337 students signed a petition calling for no fee increase for 2000, thereby showing the widespread concern among students at the prospect of further fee increases, “ said Eva Neitzert, Co-Education Vice President.
“It is clear, that this move will only further entrench the trend of declining enrolments from lower socioeconomic groups and Maori particularly in high cost courses such as Medicine,” commented Ms Neitzert.
“The fee increases highlight the disastrous effects of continual cuts to government funding of the tertiary sector. The changes to the funding of Research based programmes alone will cost the University of Auckland an estimated $3 million,” continued Ms Neitzert.
Student representatives were also frustrated at the lack of consultation during the fees setting process. Yesterday’s briefing was the only information student representatives have received from the Vice Chancellor with regards to fees for 2000 despite multiple attempts by the representatives to be involved in the fees setting process. “With Council being required to vote on the proposed budget next Monday, this is a farce. It is quite clear that there is no intention to take into consideration views expressed by students and academic staff at yesterday’s briefings,” said Sam Huggard, Administration Vice President.
Until 1997 University management presented several fee options to Council to allow Council to consider the ramifications of each proposal. Both in 1998 and 1999 only one option has been presented. “This is completely undemocratic. It leaves the Council with the choice of either setting the fee proposed by the University management or not to set fees altogether. This is no choice at all,” concluded Mr Huggard.

Next in New Zealand politics

Fair Pay Agreements To Improve Pay And Conditions For Essential Workers
By: New Zealand Government
Government Sets Pay And Workforce Expectations For The Public Sector
By: New Zealand Government
Budget 2021 Reprioritises Nearly $1 Billion
By: New Zealand Government
Statement On The Speaker And Annual Review Debate
By: New Zealand Government
Mallard Fails To Give Taxpayers A Straight Answer
By: New Zealand National Party
Independent Review To Explore Future For Local Government
By: New Zealand Government
PM Ardern And PM Morrison - Commencement Of Two-way Quarantine-free Travel Between Australia And New Zealand
By: New Zealand Government
Labour Stuck In 1970s With National Awards 2.0
By: New Zealand National Party
ACT Would Repeal Undemocratic Compulsory Unionism
By: ACT New Zealand
Bus Drivers And Supermarket Workers Will Welcome Fair Pay Agreements
By: First Union
E tū Welcomes Next Steps For Fair Pay Agreements
By: E tu
Fair Pay Agreements Should Be Terminated
By: Business NZ
FPAs Have No Place In Modern Workplace - Canterbury Chamber
By: Canterbury Employers' Chamber Of Commerce
No Positive Outcomes From FPA Proposal
By: EMA
Fair Pay Agreements Good News For Employees - Contractors Need Protection Too
By: Public Service Association
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media