12 November 2008
MEDIA RELEASE
Options before heritage takes a hit
Public concern at the loss of a number of central Dunedin heritage buildings has prompted the New Zealand Historic
Places Trust (NZHPT) to urge owners and local councils to consider other options instead of a wrecking ball.
NZHPT Otago/Southland Area Manager, Owen Graham said his office has received a number of calls from the community
expressing concern that development proposals in the central city are destroying Dunedin’s heritage character. The
latest proposals are in the lower High Street area and in Princes Street south of the Exchange where at least three
separate proposals are seeking to demolish heritage buildings.
In each case car parking will be provided as part of those developments.
Mr Graham said there are options available to owners and developers to enhance the viability of heritage buildings to
better fit the streetscape. With increasing economic uncertainty, re-use and re-development options could be more
favourable than demolition.
“There are some fine recent examples of the re-use and re-development of heritage buildings in Dunedin,” Mr Graham said.
“Two of the oldest inner-city buildings in Dunedin are located in St Andrew Street. Advertised for sale for demolition,
these buildings have had a makeover ready for use as a new café/bar venue. Also, the owner of the Bracken Court building
in Moray Place, ravaged by fire in 2006, has carried out a complete redevelopment and it is now a modern and versatile
building full of offices and retail.
“It shows what can be done with owners that have vision and empathy to buildings that are a key part of our history.”
Mr Graham said while NZHPT is New Zealand’s leading heritage agency, “it is developers and the local authorities who are
ultimately responsible and accountable for these streetscape changes” – with a district plan listing protecting a
heritage building.
“In many cases buildings have been left to deteriorate till they are beyond salvage – which essentially is demolition
through neglect. That, and the effects of gradual loss of heritage, is worrying people.
“Once the demolitions have happened, the heritage is gone forever. In the current economic times, developers and local
authorities ought to be considering whether projects are viable. Who wants a pock-marked city with sealed car parks?”
Local authorities could support developers prepared to re-use heritage buildings through a range of incentives, Mr
Graham said.
“These need to be more widely known about so that demolition becomes an option of last resort, not the only option.”
Dunedin City Council has signalled publicly that it is advancing changes to the Townscape section of the District Plan
that would involve removal of the heritage provisions.
ENDS